Received: by 2002:ac0:a5a6:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id m35-v6csp1287747imm; Wed, 22 Aug 2018 23:59:13 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ANB0VdZYCY+0EElO+GooHsJFJFsQIo/jBB1D47asCUvDIaG8dCKtTETtxD21yrGVEiicwA4DBE74 X-Received: by 2002:a63:7107:: with SMTP id m7-v6mr511381pgc.73.1535007553217; Wed, 22 Aug 2018 23:59:13 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1535007553; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=Bm/IMkbCUjHnTdjaf03DTDywZKMThwCmVGhDiB8P9JHk+C+JNjKqGZEwihJfwIM3U8 RtXkoiTB4LebfiNWV8i255WXVt4PGI3M1QSiav86Bdn91sA2im+mvQBL27MEr+Duy4g4 U9rAUaPHIck3EiUH8rthMDYd+VSQbZW1iqbxOtaDNZg3uHu17W/3XkKBujNHnKAPObp4 ilo+gpxsjZ3hHnEzlfAtOskcv++XWYwz9AP9NuImqzNo40COGoa5S2CaP4dvUMb+jkpd 8qOyad+fEfvOuOqNw85R9JjF2uueweCnvwL2I6ZbeQ/wFumZMAOy2IWaC84vVk8BtdKs HMvg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:message-id:content-transfer-encoding :content-language:in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date:from :references:cc:to:subject:reply-to:arc-authentication-results; bh=16bMTRZyftviN+7bAwNWqUJtb1CZfik3Fxs8Nwu65Vs=; b=F6wSWocW5XAkpgSb/ROFK53tyQ7CUa8rCUhUDyE5j4WcHLidKFVkxEYiI4IC2s53fQ H/Jfa+95FzOXkpN/jPvix7gebd8P+Iid7DzTcgqAvkX1/CpUPYWnMB17iU5D+TyhTLYf r6hF7N8viHI86Uj7TlwD+HohJ562ljlLhs4Ey+CmexSKQNIQTmxl/Bd6HX7ONFEu4TOC 8NcEYZeMN1l6eZrk3tcku8uGidq6XHjMK+dfFU1vzK754HzzmAb6b/l1nVaAAghz+sto IAOH3ud8XjH7vCEnCq+Tt0HKL6a0CH1qrShXboxcjv9ozW61eGo0+ohK6bxuHaQwBE1v FGNw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ibm.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id t3-v6si152611plj.413.2018.08.22.23.58.57; Wed, 22 Aug 2018 23:59:13 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ibm.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726510AbeHWKZc (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 23 Aug 2018 06:25:32 -0400 Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.156.1]:39660 "EHLO mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726243AbeHWKZb (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 Aug 2018 06:25:31 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098409.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.22/8.16.0.22) with SMTP id w7N6s0il026360 for ; Thu, 23 Aug 2018 02:57:20 -0400 Received: from e06smtp01.uk.ibm.com (e06smtp01.uk.ibm.com [195.75.94.97]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2m1qt8gtpx-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Thu, 23 Aug 2018 02:57:20 -0400 Received: from localhost by e06smtp01.uk.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Thu, 23 Aug 2018 07:57:18 +0100 Received: from b06cxnps3075.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (9.149.109.195) by e06smtp01.uk.ibm.com (192.168.101.131) with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted; (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256/256) Thu, 23 Aug 2018 07:57:14 +0100 Received: from d06av22.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av22.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.105.58]) by b06cxnps3075.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id w7N6vD6b16646204 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Thu, 23 Aug 2018 06:57:13 GMT Received: from d06av22.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB45C4C04E; Thu, 23 Aug 2018 09:57:14 +0100 (BST) Received: from d06av22.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D4EF4C044; Thu, 23 Aug 2018 09:57:14 +0100 (BST) Received: from [9.152.224.92] (unknown [9.152.224.92]) by d06av22.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Aug 2018 09:57:14 +0100 (BST) Reply-To: pmorel@linux.ibm.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/5] KVM: s390: vsie: Always test the crycbd for NULL To: David Hildenbrand Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, cohuck@redhat.com, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, frankja@linux.ibm.com, akrowiak@linux.ibm.com, borntraeger@de.ibm.com, schwidefsky@de.ibm.com, heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com References: <1534956717-14087-1-git-send-email-pmorel@linux.ibm.com> <1534956717-14087-5-git-send-email-pmorel@linux.ibm.com> From: Pierre Morel Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2018 08:57:12 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.9.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 x-cbid: 18082306-4275-0000-0000-000002AE009F X-IBM-AV-DETECTION: SAVI=unused REMOTE=unused XFE=unused x-cbparentid: 18082306-4276-0000-0000-000037B7081F Message-Id: X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:,, definitions=2018-08-23_03:,, signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1015 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=968 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1807170000 definitions=main-1808230073 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 22/08/2018 19:07, David Hildenbrand wrote: > On 22.08.2018 18:51, Pierre Morel wrote: >> BUG: the crycbd must be tested for null even if >> not crossing a page boundary (which will never >> occur in this case anyway). > > I don't see the BUG. Can you elaborate? (maybe it is too late for me) No it was too late for me :) The BUG was by me, my brain was fooled by the "else" there is not problem there. CRCBD is always tested. Sorry. > > Either we return or we check for !crycb_addr > >> >> Signed-off-by: Pierre Morel >> --- >> arch/s390/kvm/vsie.c | 2 +- >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) >> >> diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/vsie.c b/arch/s390/kvm/vsie.c >> index 0b12916..7ee4329 100644 >> --- a/arch/s390/kvm/vsie.c >> +++ b/arch/s390/kvm/vsie.c >> @@ -172,7 +172,7 @@ static int shadow_crycb(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct vsie_page *vsie_page) >> >> if ((crycb_addr & PAGE_MASK) != ((crycb_addr + 128) & PAGE_MASK)) >> return set_validity_icpt(scb_s, 0x003CU); >> - else if (!crycb_addr) >> + if (!crycb_addr) >> return set_validity_icpt(scb_s, 0x0039U); >> >> /* copy only the wrapping keys */ >> > > -- Pierre Morel Linux/KVM/QEMU in Böblingen - Germany