Received: by 2002:ac0:a5a6:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id m35-v6csp1323897imm; Thu, 23 Aug 2018 00:46:42 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA+uWPxrWPU8zodCIBgjYcsi1yJAAj422RYqZOat8znH4F/GzuJkR5PsZgD2rWN9MVd/j2Mxh/1u X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:c85:: with SMTP id 5-v6mr57642529plt.141.1535010402206; Thu, 23 Aug 2018 00:46:42 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1535010402; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=G6/PqbkprjbVLr1/sD1uCmI8hhSl1cxzAHoqFDcum3wUUDhERtCtYiZAfUfaCmtenl FSkMZq+9XdDf2E1G8Ft/9nLDoTuSblFytzLLxVnsNdSxH6GJrAIEpMEKRJxcxX/06Z25 Lv8CAvhwpebhbvwfQstoq5zmju7lgw+6eqRI/0d14C9P1Qga19mOWtWmazFrQ7+9Nkzm IN5S0U/GgH4tYC7X12cOkOBnhJMp/4w/yWs5GHaQ+Eyso9WvulyoaOzUriuDA6Z9MKyf 9Q6xz/8pZtE6ZOaLd4asO24ssvUSSVS+YNageBgk4tTBWdat7KEyMizJg/L8Uq6XfmAC tjew== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding :content-language:in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date :message-id:organization:autocrypt:openpgp:from:references:cc:to :subject:arc-authentication-results; bh=Ev+Hj89BJPbamKmrN7F5BzWpfTcDbJe1uztn+0QDlKE=; b=suA2CVgYfvSNr5atsiaIV+mZDSAEEEwsQaSLO20JbONh/dA9yc+cb2TvbYDOnAcanb 5LXKJvql6GafCT+wXvgfqBXN1eiJ9XY9VkfgJXsOqTovwzMm/63QrmkoL+9IAPZ8heL/ TPA9io8krbNu+xSGRogm8gHnP8txxQdhDPRqC27YSJa0hcuGtaqRQ0fgFMRBGcN3LQtp Nte6vyIEzBFMifZQbLqP+QpD0p242Gw1+CeA3nQF8JnC3pxC4FYAsVNgnyk2fG0DVZcg xJ1QpmDN4H9B0qeTJCxVOYfBtufJrqplFZFvk5KNmE5rXk5kX8EihN67X04PsU6cWIL8 QWmQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id a2-v6si3754676pgh.396.2018.08.23.00.46.26; Thu, 23 Aug 2018 00:46:42 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727020AbeHWLNL (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 23 Aug 2018 07:13:11 -0400 Received: from mx3-rdu2.redhat.com ([66.187.233.73]:47946 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725909AbeHWLNL (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 Aug 2018 07:13:11 -0400 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx05.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.54.5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C3DE140241C5; Thu, 23 Aug 2018 07:44:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.36.117.65] (ovpn-117-65.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.117.65]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DB1CA9EF4; Thu, 23 Aug 2018 07:44:44 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 21/22] KVM: s390: CPU model support for AP virtualization To: Tony Krowiak , Tony Krowiak , linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org Cc: freude@de.ibm.com, schwidefsky@de.ibm.com, heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com, borntraeger@de.ibm.com, cohuck@redhat.com, kwankhede@nvidia.com, bjsdjshi@linux.vnet.ibm.com, pbonzini@redhat.com, alex.williamson@redhat.com, pmorel@linux.vnet.ibm.com, alifm@linux.vnet.ibm.com, mjrosato@linux.vnet.ibm.com, jjherne@linux.vnet.ibm.com, thuth@redhat.com, pasic@linux.vnet.ibm.com, berrange@redhat.com, fiuczy@linux.vnet.ibm.com, buendgen@de.ibm.com, frankja@linux.ibm.com References: <1534196899-16987-1-git-send-email-akrowiak@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <1534196899-16987-22-git-send-email-akrowiak@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <2c2c4859-ed3e-a492-dd59-78529c7768b2@redhat.com> <95e6ee74-69aa-9805-3233-b9ec81fce516@redhat.com> <7e7a35f5-d1eb-7719-c5e8-57d6f19db675@linux.ibm.com> From: David Hildenbrand Openpgp: preference=signencrypt Autocrypt: addr=david@redhat.com; prefer-encrypt=mutual; keydata= xsFNBFXLn5EBEAC+zYvAFJxCBY9Tr1xZgcESmxVNI/0ffzE/ZQOiHJl6mGkmA1R7/uUpiCjJ dBrn+lhhOYjjNefFQou6478faXE6o2AhmebqT4KiQoUQFV4R7y1KMEKoSyy8hQaK1umALTdL QZLQMzNE74ap+GDK0wnacPQFpcG1AE9RMq3aeErY5tujekBS32jfC/7AnH7I0v1v1TbbK3Gp XNeiN4QroO+5qaSr0ID2sz5jtBLRb15RMre27E1ImpaIv2Jw8NJgW0k/D1RyKCwaTsgRdwuK Kx/Y91XuSBdz0uOyU/S8kM1+ag0wvsGlpBVxRR/xw/E8M7TEwuCZQArqqTCmkG6HGcXFT0V9 PXFNNgV5jXMQRwU0O/ztJIQqsE5LsUomE//bLwzj9IVsaQpKDqW6TAPjcdBDPLHvriq7kGjt WhVhdl0qEYB8lkBEU7V2Yb+SYhmhpDrti9Fq1EsmhiHSkxJcGREoMK/63r9WLZYI3+4W2rAc UucZa4OT27U5ZISjNg3Ev0rxU5UH2/pT4wJCfxwocmqaRr6UYmrtZmND89X0KigoFD/XSeVv jwBRNjPAubK9/k5NoRrYqztM9W6sJqrH8+UWZ1Idd/DdmogJh0gNC0+N42Za9yBRURfIdKSb B3JfpUqcWwE7vUaYrHG1nw54pLUoPG6sAA7Mehl3nd4pZUALHwARAQABzSREYXZpZCBIaWxk ZW5icmFuZCA8ZGF2aWRAcmVkaGF0LmNvbT7CwX4EEwECACgFAljj9eoCGwMFCQlmAYAGCwkI BwMCBhUIAgkKCwQWAgMBAh4BAheAAAoJEE3eEPcA/4Na5IIP/3T/FIQMxIfNzZshIq687qgG 8UbspuE/YSUDdv7r5szYTK6KPTlqN8NAcSfheywbuYD9A4ZeSBWD3/NAVUdrCaRP2IvFyELj xoMvfJccbq45BxzgEspg/bVahNbyuBpLBVjVWwRtFCUEXkyazksSv8pdTMAs9IucChvFmmq3 jJ2vlaz9lYt/lxN246fIVceckPMiUveimngvXZw21VOAhfQ+/sofXF8JCFv2mFcBDoa7eYob s0FLpmqFaeNRHAlzMWgSsP80qx5nWWEvRLdKWi533N2vC/EyunN3HcBwVrXH4hxRBMco3jvM m8VKLKao9wKj82qSivUnkPIwsAGNPdFoPbgghCQiBjBe6A75Z2xHFrzo7t1jg7nQfIyNC7ez MZBJ59sqA9EDMEJPlLNIeJmqslXPjmMFnE7Mby/+335WJYDulsRybN+W5rLT5aMvhC6x6POK z55fMNKrMASCzBJum2Fwjf/VnuGRYkhKCqqZ8gJ3OvmR50tInDV2jZ1DQgc3i550T5JDpToh dPBxZocIhzg+MBSRDXcJmHOx/7nQm3iQ6iLuwmXsRC6f5FbFefk9EjuTKcLMvBsEx+2DEx0E UnmJ4hVg7u1PQ+2Oy+Lh/opK/BDiqlQ8Pz2jiXv5xkECvr/3Sv59hlOCZMOaiLTTjtOIU7Tq 7ut6OL64oAq+zsFNBFXLn5EBEADn1959INH2cwYJv0tsxf5MUCghCj/CA/lc/LMthqQ773ga uB9mN+F1rE9cyyXb6jyOGn+GUjMbnq1o121Vm0+neKHUCBtHyseBfDXHA6m4B3mUTWo13nid 0e4AM71r0DS8+KYh6zvweLX/LL5kQS9GQeT+QNroXcC1NzWbitts6TZ+IrPOwT1hfB4WNC+X 2n4AzDqp3+ILiVST2DT4VBc11Gz6jijpC/KI5Al8ZDhRwG47LUiuQmt3yqrmN63V9wzaPhC+ xbwIsNZlLUvuRnmBPkTJwwrFRZvwu5GPHNndBjVpAfaSTOfppyKBTccu2AXJXWAE1Xjh6GOC 8mlFjZwLxWFqdPHR1n2aPVgoiTLk34LR/bXO+e0GpzFXT7enwyvFFFyAS0Nk1q/7EChPcbRb hJqEBpRNZemxmg55zC3GLvgLKd5A09MOM2BrMea+l0FUR+PuTenh2YmnmLRTro6eZ/qYwWkC u8FFIw4pT0OUDMyLgi+GI1aMpVogTZJ70FgV0pUAlpmrzk/bLbRkF3TwgucpyPtcpmQtTkWS gDS50QG9DR/1As3LLLcNkwJBZzBG6PWbvcOyrwMQUF1nl4SSPV0LLH63+BrrHasfJzxKXzqg rW28CTAE2x8qi7e/6M/+XXhrsMYG+uaViM7n2je3qKe7ofum3s4vq7oFCPsOgwARAQABwsFl BBgBAgAPBQJVy5+RAhsMBQkJZgGAAAoJEE3eEPcA/4NagOsP/jPoIBb/iXVbM+fmSHOjEshl KMwEl/m5iLj3iHnHPVLBUWrXPdS7iQijJA/VLxjnFknhaS60hkUNWexDMxVVP/6lbOrs4bDZ NEWDMktAeqJaFtxackPszlcpRVkAs6Msn9tu8hlvB517pyUgvuD7ZS9gGOMmYwFQDyytpepo YApVV00P0u3AaE0Cj/o71STqGJKZxcVhPaZ+LR+UCBZOyKfEyq+ZN311VpOJZ1IvTExf+S/5 lqnciDtbO3I4Wq0ArLX1gs1q1XlXLaVaA3yVqeC8E7kOchDNinD3hJS4OX0e1gdsx/e6COvy qNg5aL5n0Kl4fcVqM0LdIhsubVs4eiNCa5XMSYpXmVi3HAuFyg9dN+x8thSwI836FoMASwOl C7tHsTjnSGufB+D7F7ZBT61BffNBBIm1KdMxcxqLUVXpBQHHlGkbwI+3Ye+nE6HmZH7IwLwV W+Ajl7oYF+jeKaH4DZFtgLYGLtZ1LDwKPjX7VAsa4Yx7S5+EBAaZGxK510MjIx6SGrZWBrrV TEvdV00F2MnQoeXKzD7O4WFbL55hhyGgfWTHwZ457iN9SgYi1JLPqWkZB0JRXIEtjd4JEQcx +8Umfre0Xt4713VxMygW0PnQt5aSQdMD58jHFxTk092mU+yIHj5LeYgvwSgZN4airXk5yRXl SE+xAvmumFBY Organization: Red Hat GmbH Message-ID: Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2018 09:44:43 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.9.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <7e7a35f5-d1eb-7719-c5e8-57d6f19db675@linux.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.11.54.5 X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.11.55.7]); Thu, 23 Aug 2018 07:44:49 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: inspected by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.11.55.7]); Thu, 23 Aug 2018 07:44:49 +0000 (UTC) for IP:'10.11.54.5' DOMAIN:'int-mx05.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com' HELO:'smtp.corp.redhat.com' FROM:'david@redhat.com' RCPT:'' Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 22.08.2018 22:16, Tony Krowiak wrote: > On 08/22/2018 07:24 AM, David Hildenbrand wrote: >> On 22.08.2018 13:19, David Hildenbrand wrote: >>> On 13.08.2018 23:48, Tony Krowiak wrote: >>>> From: Tony Krowiak >>>> >>>> Introduces a new CPU model feature and two CPU model >>>> facilities to support AP virtualization for KVM guests. >>>> >>>> CPU model feature: >>>> >>>> The KVM_S390_VM_CPU_FEAT_AP feature indicates that >>>> AP instructions are available on the guest. This >>>> feature will be enabled by the kernel only if the AP >>>> instructions are installed on the linux host. This feature >>>> must be specifically turned on for the KVM guest from >>>> userspace to use the VFIO AP device driver for guest >>>> access to AP devices. >>>> >>>> CPU model facilities: >>>> >>>> 1. AP Query Configuration Information (QCI) facility is installed. >>>> >>>> This is indicated by setting facilities bit 12 for >>>> the guest. The kernel will not enable this facility >>>> for the guest if it is not set on the host. >>>> >>>> If this facility is not set for the KVM guest, then only >>>> APQNs with an APQI less than 16 will be used by a Linux >>>> guest regardless of the matrix configuration for the virtual >>>> machine. This is a limitation of the Linux AP bus. >>>> >>>> 2. AP Facilities Test facility (APFT) is installed. >>>> >>>> This is indicated by setting facilities bit 15 for >>>> the guest. The kernel will not enable this facility for >>>> the guest if it is not set on the host. >>>> >>>> If this facility is not set for the KVM guest, then no >>>> AP devices will be available to the guest regardless of >>>> the guest's matrix configuration for the virtual >>>> machine. This is a limitation of the Linux AP bus. >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Tony Krowiak >>>> Reviewed-by: Christian Borntraeger >>>> Reviewed-by: Halil Pasic >>>> Tested-by: Michael Mueller >>>> Tested-by: Farhan Ali >>>> Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger >>>> --- >>>> arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c | 5 +++++ >>>> arch/s390/tools/gen_facilities.c | 2 ++ >>>> 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) >>>> >>>> diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c b/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c >>>> index 1e8cb67..d5e04d2 100644 >>>> --- a/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c >>>> +++ b/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c >>>> @@ -367,6 +367,11 @@ static void kvm_s390_cpu_feat_init(void) >>>> >>>> if (MACHINE_HAS_ESOP) >>>> allow_cpu_feat(KVM_S390_VM_CPU_FEAT_ESOP); >>>> + >>>> + /* Check if AP instructions installed on host */ >>>> + if (ap_instructions_available()) >>>> + allow_cpu_feat(KVM_S390_VM_CPU_FEAT_AP); >>>> + >>>> /* >>>> * We need SIE support, ESOP (PROT_READ protection for gmap_shadow), >>>> * 64bit SCAO (SCA passthrough) and IDTE (for gmap_shadow unshadowing). >>>> diff --git a/arch/s390/tools/gen_facilities.c b/arch/s390/tools/gen_facilities.c >>>> index 90a8c9e..a52290b 100644 >>>> --- a/arch/s390/tools/gen_facilities.c >>>> +++ b/arch/s390/tools/gen_facilities.c >>>> @@ -106,6 +106,8 @@ struct facility_def { >>>> >>>> .name = "FACILITIES_KVM_CPUMODEL", >>>> .bits = (int[]){ >>>> + 12, /* AP Query Configuration Information */ >>>> + 15, /* AP Facilities Test */ >>>> -1 /* END */ >>>> } >>>> }, >>>> >>> I really wonder if we should also export the APXA facility. >>> >>> We can probe and allow that CPU feature. However, we cannot disable it >>> (as of now). >>> >>> We have other CPU features where it is the same case (basically all >>> subfunctions). See kvm_s390_get_processor_subfunc(). We probe them and >>> export them, but support to disable them has never been implemented. >>> >>> On a high level, we could then e.g. deny to start a QEMU guest if APXA >>> is available but has been disabled. (until we know that disabling it >>> actually works - if ever). >>> >>> This helps to catch nasty migration bugs (e.g. APXA suddenly >>> disappearing). Although unlikely, definitely possible. >>> >>> >>> Are there any other AP related facilities that the guest can from now on >>> probe that should also become part of the CPU model? >>> >> To be more precise, shouldn't PQAP(QCI) be handled just like other >> subfunctions? (I remember it should) > > When you suggest PQAP(QCI) be handled like other subfunctions, are you > suggesting that there should be a field in struct kvm_s390_vm_cpu_subfunc > with a bit indicating the QCI subfunction is available? The availability > of the QCI subfunction of the PQAP instruction is determined by facilities > bit 12. Is it not enough to export facilities bit 12? The feature block (128 bit) from PQAP(QCI) should be passed through a subfunction block to QEMU. So it is about passing e.g. APXA availability, not QCI itself. (as you correctly said, that is stfl 12) -- Thanks, David / dhildenb