Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261692AbTI3TYo (ORCPT ); Tue, 30 Sep 2003 15:24:44 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261695AbTI3TYn (ORCPT ); Tue, 30 Sep 2003 15:24:43 -0400 Received: from mtaw4.prodigy.net ([64.164.98.52]:57809 "EHLO mtaw4.prodigy.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261692AbTI3TYl (ORCPT ); Tue, 30 Sep 2003 15:24:41 -0400 Message-ID: <3F79D9E4.4060701@pacbell.net> Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2003 12:30:44 -0700 From: David Brownell User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.2.1) Gecko/20030225 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en, fr MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Arkadiusz Miskiewicz CC: Johannes Erdfelt , Greg KH , Milton Miller , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: USB problem. 'irq 9: nobody cared!' (FIXED!) References: <200309242257.h8OMvR5d090443@sullivan.realtime.net> <20030925180020.GB28876@kroah.com> <3F733DF1.7010008@pacbell.net> <200309301141.18595.arekm@pld-linux.org> In-Reply-To: <200309301141.18595.arekm@pld-linux.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote: > On Thursday 25 of September 2003 21:11, David Brownell wrote: > > >>The problem is that nobody has ever reported back with results from >>testing any updated patch (see attachment, the guts of this being >>from Alan Stern). Sort of makes trying be a moot point ... :) > > So I'm the first one? ;) Since then I got mixed reports -- not sure I trust them. > Your patch (http://www.ussg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0309.3/0341.html) > FIXES things for me :-) OK, that's good to hear. There are two patches that seem to work to various degrees. This isn't the least conservative fix (that'd be http://lkml.org/lkml/2003/9/29/74, returning to that odd "reset before kicking bios off" sequence) but it's good to know this also behaves. - Dave > This time I've tried 2.6.0test6 + all acpi patches from 2.6.0-mm1 (ls *acpi* > in akpm broken-out directory) + your patch and things work fine :) > Note that 2.6.0+all acpi patches from 2.6.0-mm1 without your patch doesn't > work. > > [arekm@mobarm arekm]$ cat /proc/interrupts > CPU0 > 0: 698946 XT-PIC timer > 1: 1712 XT-PIC i8042 > 2: 0 XT-PIC cascade > 3: 1561 XT-PIC irda0 > 5: 4 XT-PIC yenta > 8: 0 XT-PIC rtc > 9: 2657 XT-PIC acpi, eth0 > 10: 77708 XT-PIC VIA686A, uhci-hcd, uhci-hcd > 12: 18 XT-PIC i8042 > 14: 12408 XT-PIC ide0 > 15: 20 XT-PIC ide1 > NMI: 0 > ERR: 0 > > More details about my case in lkml archives and > http://bugme.osdl.org/show_bug.cgi?id=905 > > >>It's OK with me if you just revert the patch that adds a uhci_reset() >>entry, but based on what I saw with EHCI and OHCI that'll just turn >>up a different set of problems with certain BIOS configurations (none >>of which I have) ... which will need to be fixed by having a UHCI >>reset sequence that works correctly from _all_ initial states. >> >>- Dave > > - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/