Received: by 2002:ac0:a5a6:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id m35-v6csp1811319imm; Thu, 23 Aug 2018 09:07:15 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA+uWPzlfysU6Z17Le2iXn7FOLrfV0Jdz4blP5J0XO8ZfjjKD3D1NnpM4rY2c8GzstjwNEsLomfB X-Received: by 2002:a65:6102:: with SMTP id z2-v6mr56722548pgu.46.1535040435342; Thu, 23 Aug 2018 09:07:15 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1535040435; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=JfybJgeIkYAKEb46Y37OqytB/VP8FlIhb5CqDe6ErrQ/7a+/gIiJkWO27dRJVRaXOP 8e8AVqMsfBlOyBaGk0tDwkM0UA7Hnd0M4l8UEAUBQoj4gNnzelz2hpk8ABOiz0saPrpR XyS3dMmJc26hDWr5YlGSNHQEn1mwiyKIUpitW9qqkZ/K1uuOlJmPYStxDtd1U14M9fOa 6Jr9mq6hNG0soPs6vWnmI2SIfYVHYvwLzFVVxH2k36waS48ri7W2HME3YrksAx8w7mMH T1AB2p4EdeH05e71kjAXgytp3FDnftmvZUntmV5ussvLz3jkEZZGJc+ph7c021p9uWai p+GQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:message-id:content-transfer-encoding :content-language:in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date:from :references:cc:to:subject:reply-to:arc-authentication-results; bh=iX+hIGMx5J2a7/P8V86LpkhdzBLt0b9gpQUrVMFhMFs=; b=FMSsI6x6upX/7CeePYDOC2NSFuVZkYHWACgvkv9DUK6qwe7qvN9WdbO8lyfN9g8DXs 56b7jhvALw4wiCJ7jJSUWVbVBkDPSipm+FecqH81IC+9+9L8JAh9ofwUJ1e/3C0QrPYg zA7TpYVDvhoulAQ75tF9xEsYTg8oJual5i9iiuTAgoJtVBc0pKsWpL4aGXf3fHgP16/e vvB6m8Qc9x3/BD6ZswX9x0mIZx+sTp+460MIp8fbtIRSBxpwOHAOQudzopNjsxI7nGMK s4DQeM9pNZPM+1pqQv+mPseiQUmXEJCpWkoIpY8yQB1oN3wfsVUkGChL4wggY9Monp4B L6qA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ibm.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id w5-v6si4107538plz.175.2018.08.23.09.07.00; Thu, 23 Aug 2018 09:07:15 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ibm.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729302AbeHWOM7 (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 23 Aug 2018 10:12:59 -0400 Received: from mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.158.5]:53572 "EHLO mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727785AbeHWOM6 (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 Aug 2018 10:12:58 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098413.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.22/8.16.0.22) with SMTP id w7NAd2xg093183 for ; Thu, 23 Aug 2018 06:43:51 -0400 Received: from e06smtp05.uk.ibm.com (e06smtp05.uk.ibm.com [195.75.94.101]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2m1teutfkv-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Thu, 23 Aug 2018 06:43:51 -0400 Received: from localhost by e06smtp05.uk.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Thu, 23 Aug 2018 11:43:49 +0100 Received: from b06cxnps3075.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (9.149.109.195) by e06smtp05.uk.ibm.com (192.168.101.135) with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted; (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256/256) Thu, 23 Aug 2018 11:43:45 +0100 Received: from d06av22.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av22.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.105.58]) by b06cxnps3075.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id w7NAhibr40828980 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Thu, 23 Aug 2018 10:43:44 GMT Received: from d06av22.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1A154C04E; Thu, 23 Aug 2018 13:43:45 +0100 (BST) Received: from d06av22.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 663934C046; Thu, 23 Aug 2018 13:43:44 +0100 (BST) Received: from [9.152.224.92] (unknown [9.152.224.92]) by d06av22.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Aug 2018 13:43:44 +0100 (BST) Reply-To: pmorel@linux.ibm.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 12/22] s390: vfio-ap: sysfs interfaces to configure control domains To: Cornelia Huck , Tony Krowiak Cc: Halil Pasic , Christian Borntraeger , Tony Krowiak , linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, freude@de.ibm.com, schwidefsky@de.ibm.com, heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com, kwankhede@nvidia.com, bjsdjshi@linux.vnet.ibm.com, pbonzini@redhat.com, alex.williamson@redhat.com, pmorel@linux.vnet.ibm.com, alifm@linux.vnet.ibm.com, mjrosato@linux.vnet.ibm.com, jjherne@linux.vnet.ibm.com, thuth@redhat.com, pasic@linux.vnet.ibm.com, berrange@redhat.com, fiuczy@linux.vnet.ibm.com, buendgen@de.ibm.com, frankja@linux.ibm.com References: <1534196899-16987-1-git-send-email-akrowiak@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <1534196899-16987-13-git-send-email-akrowiak@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20180820162317.08bd7d23.cohuck@redhat.com> <660de00a-c403-28c1-4df4-82a973ab3ad5@linux.ibm.com> <20180821172548.57a6c758.cohuck@redhat.com> <82a391ee-85b1-cdc7-0f9b-d37fd8ba8e47@linux.ibm.com> <20180822114250.59a250aa.cohuck@redhat.com> <8bc5f207-f913-825c-f9fc-0a2c7fd280aa@linux.ibm.com> <219b352b-d5a2-189c-e205-82e7f9ae3d64@de.ibm.com> <9ef5fcb9-02e0-88e3-007c-eedb14e6db80@linux.ibm.com> <20180823122525.02fc4af3.cohuck@redhat.com> From: Pierre Morel Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2018 12:43:42 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.9.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20180823122525.02fc4af3.cohuck@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 x-cbid: 18082310-0020-0000-0000-000002BAA5EE X-IBM-AV-DETECTION: SAVI=unused REMOTE=unused XFE=unused x-cbparentid: 18082310-0021-0000-0000-00002108013E Message-Id: <25a44526-a2d6-c632-6a6d-8ca385925731@linux.ibm.com> X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:,, definitions=2018-08-23_05:,, signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1015 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1807170000 definitions=main-1808230114 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 23/08/2018 12:25, Cornelia Huck wrote: > On Wed, 22 Aug 2018 15:16:19 -0400 > Tony Krowiak wrote: > >> One of the things I suggested in a private conversation with Christian >> earlier >> today was to provide an additional rw sysfs attribute - a boolean - that >> indicates >> whether all usage domains should also be control domains. The default >> could be >> true. This would allow one to configure guests with usage-only domains >> as well >> as satisfy the convention. > > Would this additional attribute then control "add usage domains to the > list of control domains automatically", or "don't allow to add a usage > domain if it has not already been added as a control domain"? > > One thing I'm still unsure about is how libvirt comes into the picture > here. Will it consume the setting, or actively manipulate it? > > [In general, I'm not very clear about how libvirt will interact with the > whole infrastructure...] > When I read you it convince me that it is not wise to change anything that has been already discuss and could impact the Libvirt. Regards, Pierre -- Pierre Morel Linux/KVM/QEMU in Böblingen - Germany