Received: by 2002:ac0:a5a6:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id m35-v6csp1830445imm; Thu, 23 Aug 2018 09:25:39 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ANB0VdZMYO/4uHRA2UABT1vx1Vw6/ph1TtL4nW6aMp/KxDiud/g49cB4axCb81qsiXeh1LtmE/ew X-Received: by 2002:a63:4c46:: with SMTP id m6-v6mr6391780pgl.156.1535041539730; Thu, 23 Aug 2018 09:25:39 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1535041539; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=ZNpeRbWEQA69muw4d6ky6kiwO5YgQQK6zdYD87ZDdfAOU189xT6kf7MTuR7MMrIPdR 0NkcDb7/JqA68M4/3OGNOPBkgW/CeoeRw9CEojPhcgdVGqq8m/Igp9JIDmfxZXBtPA/y GjL8srlXUW5VUmxzKJ4bTzqAcvvXt0aI9uskV5C0J2UQUze+MpiBSi2UmGajDhxr9LVA 1Er6AtU0je1tWGufZa6CaTxHVQJGrTSd3t1/N6hJf5Kl4IjsRgVgZRSGh5PZWZsBvypT +R8eVnvejrqeNoOza153vrH0LW8G2uzbgxjutHDk3c48AkZY0c7ik4U1BM1jFYlcUK7F 1M+g== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from :arc-authentication-results; bh=ak6MOS3ZhBmMQTWP0ypCdypotAJ9mKavxN4ODG+4KF8=; b=okyOoChvOwRTnRV6U+jv5X3WSN033Jz5eSZ7u2hGHywOJ95deBUMh275s8ao+IKyzv f+XnsKe6eaXuQmOFOPjHjQw0BxaOVlkae53oWyCxYgZYmtzeBmx4rckq/1KqMiWDAOU4 Hg1gSRUUMEizyuQIhvn900lI1eZa68wjD+VOwczxLE50iP5yXx9Ujf3hhyZO3kHXaW/v 2CtLvnqpTDE659BOomfzPxmhOA+z1z4MWrG7QvkZ+tSvaR4F4nl4EyPrXJPW92p1ZYjU 3WHdH6YXlcIzP0aZUGuL8eis7xbf2AHVPtfNHY02mHpzWDeY/j5V51+r97NxlVneAMGq 7isA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id u7-v6si5149461pfi.96.2018.08.23.09.25.24; Thu, 23 Aug 2018 09:25:39 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1732494AbeHWROp (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 23 Aug 2018 13:14:45 -0400 Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:49230 "EHLO mx1.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728617AbeHWROp (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 Aug 2018 13:14:45 -0400 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at test-mx.suse.de Received: from relay2.suse.de (unknown [195.135.220.254]) by mx1.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02A35ACA4; Thu, 23 Aug 2018 13:44:56 +0000 (UTC) From: Vlastimil Babka To: Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar Cc: "H . Peter Anvin" , x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Linus Torvalds , Andi Kleen , Dave Hansen , Michal Hocko , Vlastimil Babka , stable@vger.kernel.org, Christopher Snowhill , George Anchev Subject: [PATCH] x86/speculation/l1tf: fix off-by-one error when warning that system has too much RAM Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2018 15:44:18 +0200 Message-Id: <20180823134418.17008-1-vbabka@suse.cz> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.18.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Two users have reported [1] that they have an "extremely unlikely" system with more than MAX_PA/2 memory and L1TF mitigation is not effective. In fact it's a CPU with 36bits phys limit (64GB) and 32GB memory, but due to holes in the e820 map, the main region is almost 500MB over the 32GB limit: [ 0.000000] BIOS-e820: [mem 0x0000000100000000-0x000000081effffff] usable Suggestions to use 'mem=32G' to prefer L1TF mitigation while losing the 500MB revealed, that there's an off-by-one error in the check in l1tf_select_mitigation(). l1tf_pfn_limit() returns the last usable pfn (inclusive), but it's more common and hopefully less error-prone to return the first pfn that's over limit, so this patch changes that and updates the other callers. [1] https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1105536 Reported-by: George Anchev Reported-by: Christopher Snowhill Fixes: 17dbca119312 ("x86/speculation/l1tf: Add sysfs reporting for l1tf") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Vlastimil Babka --- arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h | 2 +- arch/x86/mm/init.c | 2 +- arch/x86/mm/mmap.c | 2 +- 3 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h index a0a52274cb4a..c24297268ebc 100644 --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h @@ -183,7 +183,7 @@ extern void cpu_detect(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c); static inline unsigned long long l1tf_pfn_limit(void) { - return BIT_ULL(boot_cpu_data.x86_phys_bits - 1 - PAGE_SHIFT) - 1; + return BIT_ULL(boot_cpu_data.x86_phys_bits - 1 - PAGE_SHIFT); } extern void early_cpu_init(void); diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/init.c b/arch/x86/mm/init.c index 02de3d6065c4..63a6f9fcaf20 100644 --- a/arch/x86/mm/init.c +++ b/arch/x86/mm/init.c @@ -923,7 +923,7 @@ unsigned long max_swapfile_size(void) if (boot_cpu_has_bug(X86_BUG_L1TF)) { /* Limit the swap file size to MAX_PA/2 for L1TF workaround */ - unsigned long long l1tf_limit = l1tf_pfn_limit() + 1; + unsigned long long l1tf_limit = l1tf_pfn_limit(); /* * We encode swap offsets also with 3 bits below those for pfn * which makes the usable limit higher. diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/mmap.c b/arch/x86/mm/mmap.c index f40ab8185d94..1e95d57760cf 100644 --- a/arch/x86/mm/mmap.c +++ b/arch/x86/mm/mmap.c @@ -257,7 +257,7 @@ bool pfn_modify_allowed(unsigned long pfn, pgprot_t prot) /* If it's real memory always allow */ if (pfn_valid(pfn)) return true; - if (pfn > l1tf_pfn_limit() && !capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN)) + if (pfn >= l1tf_pfn_limit() && !capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN)) return false; return true; } -- 2.18.0