Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Fri, 24 Aug 2018 09:51:31 +0200
From:   Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@bootlin.com>
To:     Peter Rosin <peda@axentia.se>
Cc:     linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
        Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@microchip.com>,
        Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>,
        dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Jyri Sarha <jsarha@ti.com>,
        Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>,
        Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@samsung.com>,
        Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
        Jacopo Mondi <jacopo+renesas@jmondi.org>,
        Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@iki.fi>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 0/4] drm/atmel-hlcdc: bus-width override support
Message-ID: <20180824095131.5d9cb33f@bbrezillon>
In-Reply-To: <20180810130359.9882-1-peda@axentia.se>
References: <20180810130359.9882-1-peda@axentia.se>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

Hi Peter,

On Fri, 10 Aug 2018 15:03:55 +0200
Peter Rosin <peda@axentia.se> wrote:

> Hi!
> 
> The background for these patches is that our PCB interface between
> the SAMA5D3 and the ds90c185 lvds encoder is only using 16 bits, and
> this has to be described somewhere, or the atmel-hlcdc driver have no
> chance of selecting the correct output mode. Since we have similar
> problems with a tda19988 HDMI encoder I added patches to override
> the atmel-hlcdc output format via DT properties compatible with the
> media video-interface binding and things start to play together.
> 
> Cheers,
> Peter
> 
> Changes since v7  https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/8/4/288
> - The ep device_node was leaked in v7 patch 3/3, so add patch 3/4
>   which simplifies fixing this in patch 4/4 (and adds flexibility)
>   and adjust patch 4/4 to the changes done in the new 3/4.
> - return -ENOMEM on allocation failure in patch 4/4

I stopped following the discussion at some point. Are there any open
issues or Ack you're waiting for?