Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CALCETrXY=PSdp6mpQ89yBQPsMrDj7j2p8AyLR1o4_+heiMzRbQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20180817121251.4EB5318E01A1@virtux64.softrans.com.au> <CALCETrXY=PSdp6mpQ89yBQPsMrDj7j2p8AyLR1o4_+heiMzRbQ@mail.gmail.com>
From:   John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>
Date:   Fri, 24 Aug 2018 11:25:29 -0700
Message-ID: <CALAqxLXk3shySjd7__Rxvegw-dUDETmAmVOPR6Oto0j3mpZv5w@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH] x86/vdso: Handle clock_gettime(CLOCK_TAI) in vDSO
To:     Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Cc:     Matt Rickard <matt@softrans.com.au>,
        Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>, X86 ML <x86@kernel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Fri, Aug 24, 2018 at 10:47 AM, Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> wrote:
> Minor nit: if it's not literally a resend, don't call it "RESEND" in
> $SUBJECT.  Call it v2, please.
>
> Also, I added LKML and relevant maintainers to cc.  John and Stephen:
> this is a purely x86 patch, but it digs into the core timekeeping
> structures a bit.

From a quick review, looks reasonable, so no objections from me.

thanks
-john