Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261406AbTKBEFs (ORCPT ); Sat, 1 Nov 2003 23:05:48 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261411AbTKBEFs (ORCPT ); Sat, 1 Nov 2003 23:05:48 -0500 Received: from SteeleMR-loadb-NAT-49.caltech.edu ([131.215.49.69]:48590 "EHLO water-ox.its.caltech.edu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261406AbTKBEFr (ORCPT ); Sat, 1 Nov 2003 23:05:47 -0500 Date: Sat, 1 Nov 2003 20:05:44 -0800 (PST) From: "Noah J. Misch" X-X-Sender: noah@sue To: Matthew Wilcox Cc: linux-ia64@linuxia64.org, acpi-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [ACPI] [PATCH][RFC] Clean up Kconfig logic for IA64 ACPI In-Reply-To: <20031102031644.GB3824@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk> Message-ID: References: <20031102031644.GB3824@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 877 Lines: 26 On Sun, 2 Nov 2003, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > > I found the Kconfig logic for ACPI and IA64, as defined in arch/ia64/Kconfig and > > drivers/acpi/Kconfig to be a bit redundant and hard to follow. It appears to do > > the following: > > I posted a similar patch here: > > http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-ia64&m=106555019402117&w=2 I do not read linux-ia64 regularly, so I did not notice your work. I apologize for not acknowledging it. Why not include drivers/Kconfig and scrap the individual subdirectory includes, as i386 does? Also, it looks like your patch makes ACPI non-mandatory. Is that intentional? Thanks, Noah - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/