Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261601AbTKBJh6 (ORCPT ); Sun, 2 Nov 2003 04:37:58 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261602AbTKBJh6 (ORCPT ); Sun, 2 Nov 2003 04:37:58 -0500 Received: from fw.osdl.org ([65.172.181.6]:64964 "EHLO mail.osdl.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261601AbTKBJh5 (ORCPT ); Sun, 2 Nov 2003 04:37:57 -0500 Date: Sun, 2 Nov 2003 01:40:11 -0800 From: Andrew Morton To: Herbert Xu Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: 2.6.0test9 Reiserfs boot time "buffer layer error at fs/buffer.c:431" Message-Id: <20031102014011.09001c81.akpm@osdl.org> In-Reply-To: <20031102092723.GA4964@gondor.apana.org.au> References: <20031029141931.6c4ebdb5.akpm@osdl.org> <20031101233354.1f566c80.akpm@osdl.org> <20031102092723.GA4964@gondor.apana.org.au> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.4 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1380 Lines: 36 Herbert Xu wrote: > > On Sat, Nov 01, 2003 at 11:33:54PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > > > > aargh. I thought Debian's 2.6 kernels were unmodified. Are they carrying > > any other changes? > > Yes we are. You can find the changes in > > http://http.us.debian.org/debian/pool/main/k/kernel-source-2.6.0-test9/ Where are the separated patches? That's 170k of stuff you're sitting on. Is there any plan to get it synced up? > > That _should_ work. The pagecache pages should be in such a state that all > > buffers are freeable and yes, we can leave the pagecache there. But this > > could cause problems if the device was repartitioned in between, or if it > > was hotswapped. I don't think we shoot down pagecache anywhere else for > > this. > > Yes, however it should be safe to stop set_blocksize from calling > truncate_inode_pages, right? No, because _something_ has to rub out the wrong-sized buffer_heads. One could add some new function which walks the pagecache and removes the buffer_heads from the pages, leaving the pages there. There doesn't seem a lot of point in it though? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/