Received: by 2002:ac0:a5a6:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id m35-v6csp5368738imm; Sun, 26 Aug 2018 18:11:00 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ANB0VdYesf5jBqb78yi7Uo2uNDYn2eMw2JWzIc4AsIA2Hr2QatuFwkckJfwDd7OZ5P5kEkLM/AfB X-Received: by 2002:a63:1d22:: with SMTP id d34-v6mr10340593pgd.133.1535332260080; Sun, 26 Aug 2018 18:11:00 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1535332260; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=GExGFsrIkXidXTjGY5ajn+qp/oIKxhKdnlTJT1KWPiZhPNVVdIBCaRSMPwpK2wQY6v d4zezM+jJ4zjcUDvFE7Gjjgd9UkF4da2yZkzrrhSH/+wFQ0dLlI+Q90S293sCC++Z4qa daRVKndK3upAizmTf+ZAI80G2W17NQZWuxcY/yDv2Jkdng7lzuyJSlcAo6HXRWvwF8y0 XK8s/UasFRm51dGC2oIA0MK8AVcQkgpZfcnncRiMACW+yPNjcCVBT00hhX80iJ6czArK QQwHLAZTZ/VN3Bf8g5Pg0glXv7iJRRlob6ECpksDA8LuWYRq/CPG1WIH6Zj4e26dmmlG Ua7w== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-language :content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date :message-id:from:references:cc:to:subject:arc-authentication-results; bh=2Bar8Cz5ZNLn5DKMljVL+RY/C3qjl3vGtQUj7gntcCw=; b=ocqZ6pGbTEvcOYA3EEsB6zfxCfnGTMiIrlFZLhrfVsrS4Xyfbyjr+HCB4q/eB0nlI0 AAecc0VpnFJQswtsXbx6O7mCGwL+uOxEFaXCLyJrW0wh2Rrdv77i7CJSLc6fTDO3Gv6b nWyfWshONeVe8A7pYvUBgLwsC42+8/8Q/dPpd3+5YzsMDy7OeDmyCGq6Y8gHppzKgrHC TrKqZSef3sMdRUUGFZAmmytnQzcOL7ygsyqR9RT4g+sDV1blv9TjlXs5I9NH9B/wo/mu LB/bjx4H4tNthQOs+8JaCjKFm8WUcBE6KUvj9zMGFx5lGotvd+chsSA0ZE5Jr/LzNW5S Eglw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id f40-v6si13495212plb.504.2018.08.26.18.10.45; Sun, 26 Aug 2018 18:11:00 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727077AbeH0EyE (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 27 Aug 2018 00:54:04 -0400 Received: from szxga04-in.huawei.com ([45.249.212.190]:11606 "EHLO huawei.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726825AbeH0EyE (ORCPT ); Mon, 27 Aug 2018 00:54:04 -0400 Received: from DGGEMS414-HUB.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.59]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id 5239296697043; Mon, 27 Aug 2018 09:09:41 +0800 (CST) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (10.63.173.108) by DGGEMS414-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.214) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.399.0; Mon, 27 Aug 2018 09:09:34 +0800 Subject: Re: [PATCH NET 3/3] net: hns: add configuration constraints for 1000M half To: Andrew Lunn CC: , , , , , References: <1535082143-122281-1-git-send-email-lipeng321@huawei.com> <1535082143-122281-4-git-send-email-lipeng321@huawei.com> <20180824034119.GA29111@lunn.ch> <194ac663-94d8-55e2-0231-a6be53e35f04@huawei.com> <20180824132857.GA1999@lunn.ch> <7c40c758-2ef2-665d-f429-0cc4e63a7a38@huawei.com> <20180825180721.GB23992@lunn.ch> From: "lipeng (Y)" Message-ID: Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2018 09:08:45 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.5.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20180825180721.GB23992@lunn.ch> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Language: en-US X-Originating-IP: [10.63.173.108] X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 2018/8/26 2:07, Andrew Lunn wrote: >> This patch is a  theoretical protect, and the problem does not really >> happen. >> >> I think you really get the point, do you think we need this patch? > I think it is not needed. > > And if it was needed, it would indicate there is a bug somewhere else. Hi, Andrew It is a theoretical protect,we can remove  this patch from patchset. Thanks. > > Andrew > > . >