Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Subject: [PATCH 0/8] RISC-V: Assorted Cleanups
Date:   Mon, 27 Aug 2018 11:42:35 -0700
Message-Id: <20180827184243.25344-1-palmer@sifive.com>
Cc:     Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@sifive.com>, aou@eecs.berkeley.edu,
        daniel.lezcano@linaro.org, tglx@linutronix.de,
        jason@lakedaemon.net, marc.zyngier@arm.com, atish.patra@wdc.com,
        dmitriy@oss-tech.org, catalin.marinas@arm.com,
        ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org, Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        jeremy.linton@arm.com, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
From:   Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@sifive.com>
To:      linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

I finally got around to answering a very old email in my inbox that was
a response to our original patch set.  These are meant to cause little
to no functional changes to the port, but I've given them very little
testing so I wouldn't be surprised if I've managed to screw something
up here.

I'll be sure to give these some testing before putting them on for-next,
but I figured it'd be better to send them out now rather than later.