Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Subject: Re: linux-next: new maintainer/tree for the libata tree?
To:     Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc:     Linux-Next Mailing List <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
References: <20180828071944.02b13db4@canb.auug.org.au>
From:   Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Message-ID: <27ef8afc-c490-5984-5a18-1ee5ce51d556@kernel.dk>
Date:   Mon, 27 Aug 2018 19:15:23 -0600
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/60.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20180828071944.02b13db4@canb.auug.org.au>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On 8/27/18 3:20 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Tejun, Jens,
> 
> I noticed the maintaership change - so what shuld I sues for linux-next,
> now?
> 
> I currently have
> 
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tj/libata.git#for-next

I'll merge into my for-next branch on the block tree, I'm don't plan on
doing separate trees for this, just separate branches. And everything I
queue up for the next version will end up in my for-next branch.

-- 
Jens Axboe