Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Tue, 28 Aug 2018 20:55:23 +0300
From:   Roman Kagan <rkagan@virtuozzo.com>
To:     Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>
Cc:     kvm@vger.kernel.org, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
        Radim =?utf-8?B?S3LEjW3DocWZ?= <rkrcmar@redhat.com>,
        "K. Y. Srinivasan" <kys@microsoft.com>,
        Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@microsoft.com>,
        Stephen Hemminger <sthemmin@microsoft.com>,
        "Michael Kelley (EOSG)" <Michael.H.Kelley@microsoft.com>,
        Mohammed Gamal <mmorsy@redhat.com>,
        Cathy Avery <cavery@redhat.com>,
        Wanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@hotmail.com>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 5/5] KVM: x86: hyperv: implement PV IPI send hypercalls
Message-ID: <20180828175523.GL2326@rkaganb.sw.ru>
Mail-Followup-To: Roman Kagan <rkagan@virtuozzo.com>,
        Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
        Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
        Radim =?utf-8?B?S3LEjW3DocWZ?= <rkrcmar@redhat.com>,
        "K. Y. Srinivasan" <kys@microsoft.com>,
        Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@microsoft.com>,
        Stephen Hemminger <sthemmin@microsoft.com>,
        "Michael Kelley (EOSG)" <Michael.H.Kelley@microsoft.com>,
        Mohammed Gamal <mmorsy@redhat.com>, Cathy Avery <cavery@redhat.com>,
        Wanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@hotmail.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
References: <20180827164858.12496-1-vkuznets@redhat.com>
 <20180827164858.12496-6-vkuznets@redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20180827164858.12496-6-vkuznets@redhat.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)
Received-SPF: None (protection.outlook.com: virtuozzo.com does not designate
 permitted sender hosts)
SpamDiagnosticOutput: 1:22
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-OriginalArrivalTime: 28 Aug 2018 17:55:28.0592
 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 401c5a75-cc32-478e-553b-08d60d0f70e8
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-FromEntityHeader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Id: 0bc7f26d-0264-416e-a6fc-8352af79c58f
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: VI1PR08MB3597
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Mon, Aug 27, 2018 at 06:48:58PM +0200, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote:
> Using hypercall for sending IPIs is faster because this allows to specify
> any number of vCPUs (even > 64 with sparse CPU set), the whole procedure
> will take only one VMEXIT.
> 
> Current Hyper-V TLFS (v5.0b) claims that HvCallSendSyntheticClusterIpi
> hypercall can't be 'fast' (passing parameters through registers) but
> apparently this is not true, Windows always uses it as 'fast' so we need
> to support that.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>
> ---
>  Documentation/virtual/kvm/api.txt |   7 +++
>  arch/x86/kvm/hyperv.c             | 105 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  arch/x86/kvm/trace.h              |  42 +++++++++++++++
>  arch/x86/kvm/x86.c                |   1 +
>  include/uapi/linux/kvm.h          |   1 +
>  5 files changed, 156 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/virtual/kvm/api.txt b/Documentation/virtual/kvm/api.txt
> index c664064f76fb..d6fb93f22c0b 100644
> --- a/Documentation/virtual/kvm/api.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/virtual/kvm/api.txt
> @@ -4762,3 +4762,10 @@ CPU when the exception is taken. If this virtual SError is taken to EL1 using
>  AArch64, this value will be reported in the ISS field of ESR_ELx.
>  
>  See KVM_CAP_VCPU_EVENTS for more details.
> +8.20 KVM_CAP_HYPERV_SEND_IPI
> +
> +Architectures: x86
> +
> +This capability indicates that KVM supports paravirtualized Hyper-V IPI send
> +hypercalls:
> +HvCallSendSyntheticClusterIpi, HvCallSendSyntheticClusterIpiEx.
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/hyperv.c b/arch/x86/kvm/hyperv.c
> index d1a911132b59..dadec987a39b 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/hyperv.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/hyperv.c
> @@ -1360,6 +1360,97 @@ static u64 kvm_hv_flush_tlb(struct kvm_vcpu *current_vcpu, u64 ingpa,
>  		((u64)rep_cnt << HV_HYPERCALL_REP_COMP_OFFSET);
>  }
>  
> +static u64 kvm_hv_send_ipi(struct kvm_vcpu *current_vcpu, u64 ingpa, u64 outgpa,
> +			   bool ex, bool fast)
> +{
> +	struct kvm *kvm = current_vcpu->kvm;
> +	struct hv_send_ipi_ex send_ipi_ex;
> +	struct hv_send_ipi send_ipi;
> +	struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu;
> +	unsigned long valid_bank_mask;
> +	u64 sparse_banks[64];
> +	int sparse_banks_len, bank, i;
> +	struct kvm_lapic_irq irq = {.delivery_mode = APIC_DM_FIXED};
> +	bool all_cpus;
> +
> +	if (!ex) {
> +		if (!fast) {
> +			if (unlikely(kvm_read_guest(kvm, ingpa, &send_ipi,
> +						    sizeof(send_ipi))))
> +				return HV_STATUS_INVALID_HYPERCALL_INPUT;
> +			sparse_banks[0] = send_ipi.cpu_mask;
> +			irq.vector = send_ipi.vector;
> +		} else {
> +			/* 'reserved' part of hv_send_ipi should be 0 */
> +			if (unlikely(ingpa >> 32 != 0))
> +				return HV_STATUS_INVALID_HYPERCALL_INPUT;
> +			sparse_banks[0] = outgpa;
> +			irq.vector = (u32)ingpa;
> +		}
> +		all_cpus = false;
> +		valid_bank_mask = BIT_ULL(0);
> +
> +		trace_kvm_hv_send_ipi(irq.vector, sparse_banks[0]);
> +	} else {
> +		if (unlikely(kvm_read_guest(kvm, ingpa, &send_ipi_ex,
> +					    sizeof(send_ipi_ex))))
> +			return HV_STATUS_INVALID_HYPERCALL_INPUT;
> +
> +		trace_kvm_hv_send_ipi_ex(send_ipi_ex.vector,
> +					 send_ipi_ex.vp_set.format,
> +					 send_ipi_ex.vp_set.valid_bank_mask);
> +
> +		irq.vector = send_ipi_ex.vector;
> +		valid_bank_mask = send_ipi_ex.vp_set.valid_bank_mask;
> +		sparse_banks_len = bitmap_weight(&valid_bank_mask, 64) *
> +			sizeof(sparse_banks[0]);
> +
> +		all_cpus = send_ipi_ex.vp_set.format == HV_GENERIC_SET_ALL;
> +
> +		if (!sparse_banks_len)
> +			goto ret_success;
> +
> +		if (!all_cpus &&
> +		    kvm_read_guest(kvm,
> +				   ingpa + offsetof(struct hv_send_ipi_ex,
> +						    vp_set.bank_contents),
> +				   sparse_banks,
> +				   sparse_banks_len))
> +			return HV_STATUS_INVALID_HYPERCALL_INPUT;
> +	}
> +
> +	if ((irq.vector < HV_IPI_LOW_VECTOR) ||
> +	    (irq.vector > HV_IPI_HIGH_VECTOR))
> +		return HV_STATUS_INVALID_HYPERCALL_INPUT;
> +
> +	if (all_cpus) {
> +		kvm_for_each_vcpu(i, vcpu, kvm) {
> +			/* We fail only when APIC is disabled */
> +			if (!kvm_apic_set_irq(vcpu, &irq, NULL))
> +				return HV_STATUS_INVALID_HYPERCALL_INPUT;
> +		}
> +		goto ret_success;
> +	}
> +
> +	for_each_set_bit(bank, (unsigned long *)&valid_bank_mask, 64) {
> +		for_each_set_bit(i, (unsigned long *)&sparse_banks[bank], 64) {
> +			u32 vp_index = bank * 64 + i;
> +			struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu =
> +				get_vcpu_by_vpidx(kvm, vp_index);
> +
> +			/* Unknown vCPU specified */
> +			if (!vcpu)
> +				continue;
> +
> +			/* We fail only when APIC is disabled */
> +			kvm_apic_set_irq(vcpu, &irq, NULL);
> +		}
> +	}
> +
> +ret_success:
> +	return HV_STATUS_SUCCESS;
> +}
> +

I still think that splitting kvm_hv_send_ipi into three functions would
make it more readable, but that's a matter of taste of course, so I'm OK
if Radim insists otherwise.

Reviewed-by: Roman Kagan <rkagan@virtuozzo.com>