Received: by 2002:ac0:a5a6:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id m35-v6csp52663imm; Tue, 28 Aug 2018 15:54:38 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ANB0VdbrbXo8bmxI3Pj07ykzuTWF37dNuCbBrw36YDUPhcx12DylSzsKQfwZbWd59kVz3DOQX1f1 X-Received: by 2002:a62:c182:: with SMTP id i124-v6mr3262624pfg.248.1535496878757; Tue, 28 Aug 2018 15:54:38 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1535496878; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=nFNYpKYuquFOxFHF8vI3jhqg4QpTUwxYPEDASa7zlOxnp+Eb3oTRPyYSxmBszQVKj4 TsXZ0i5xSypj20gTUnrIBGg4LhlZ2i1cwTrpNyomuSS+d8cimP3EubF0/IjjTr3lDfSZ wyNSI968I3jBjDATk2luWZHZ4yw0Cv8AO6FNDx2AQhpf3HOH0SPgdLxmKPvRsjxL4vpB mUIKCxrQyXdnrSn/dy6mfcd/VHll/8y3J0lEGLGZEt+9tE0kR5D9fbSV9/YJBCp12Zwd Ce+xk2xrDTTw+SK3iSCuJM29uXW+Dt8FWdVIw8l58tlb8Tn5SHCuSL3mPLRjYYrB0sWw uDrQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:message-id:content-transfer-encoding :content-language:in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date:from :references:cc:to:subject:arc-authentication-results; bh=Wz2LL0pyXyMIvVD0le841f5PSMYhg2o5NIBzj74IFkQ=; b=f77GJIAAW10SxCBgGOsFaoBAo2F7h1jqwdVTZVFJcDpPSUOUOJvqYd2VFewRuk2HLc dFHvV0AenLJwLSHN64ikG+ZZw8AZNtXNi4mmqMSLu3r5Br/HxFzQ2ey8ffCefci3saQD wTMgcgyOUmJdL+BsFwPeYGvKxTjgCwiH+xmdFXRA2yHCK0c2JA+D8TmliZDu47hc7qTs yALDZS8boc0Fu1rvWjeDOPnUsxxmfxj9+1Fp4Gu+hVoNLPzGDJEHimOaJxuKefVZUaKC VxqJFcgrtSDH4SHJVpGV8n+8pHCRT0T8194qJ9D09Q10FGLAN/b2qbGdxVAXjN7hGPtz tsCA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ibm.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id q1-v6si2113501plb.35.2018.08.28.15.54.07; Tue, 28 Aug 2018 15:54:38 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ibm.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727518AbeH2Cki (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 28 Aug 2018 22:40:38 -0400 Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.156.1]:49088 "EHLO mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727067AbeH2Cki (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Aug 2018 22:40:38 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098410.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.22/8.16.0.22) with SMTP id w7SMiA34111833 for ; Tue, 28 Aug 2018 18:46:49 -0400 Received: from e16.ny.us.ibm.com (e16.ny.us.ibm.com [129.33.205.206]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2m5e4xjfyj-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Tue, 28 Aug 2018 18:46:48 -0400 Received: from localhost by e16.ny.us.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Tue, 28 Aug 2018 18:46:47 -0400 Received: from b01cxnp23034.gho.pok.ibm.com (9.57.198.29) by e16.ny.us.ibm.com (146.89.104.203) with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted; (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256/256) Tue, 28 Aug 2018 18:46:44 -0400 Received: from b01ledav004.gho.pok.ibm.com (b01ledav004.gho.pok.ibm.com [9.57.199.109]) by b01cxnp23034.gho.pok.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id w7SMkhIf25428026 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Tue, 28 Aug 2018 22:46:43 GMT Received: from b01ledav004.gho.pok.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0E09112063; Tue, 28 Aug 2018 18:46:17 -0400 (EDT) Received: from b01ledav004.gho.pok.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1562B112064; Tue, 28 Aug 2018 18:46:16 -0400 (EDT) Received: from oc6857751186.ibm.com (unknown [9.85.148.35]) by b01ledav004.gho.pok.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Tue, 28 Aug 2018 18:46:15 -0400 (EDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH] soc: Convert to using %pOFn instead of device_node.name To: Li Yang Cc: Rob Herring , Heiko Stuebner , linux-soc@vger.kernel.org, lkml , Jon Hunter , David Brown , Thierry Reding , Santosh Shilimkar , Andy Gross , linuxppc-dev , "moderated list:ARM/FREESCALE IMX / MXC ARM ARCHITECTURE" , Zhao Qiang References: <20180828015252.28511-1-robh@kernel.org> <20180828015252.28511-43-robh@kernel.org> From: Tyrel Datwyler Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2018 15:46:40 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.9.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 x-cbid: 18082822-0072-0000-0000-00000398BFF6 X-IBM-SpamModules-Scores: X-IBM-SpamModules-Versions: BY=3.00009629; HX=3.00000242; KW=3.00000007; PH=3.00000004; SC=3.00000266; SDB=6.01080268; UDB=6.00557211; IPR=6.00860252; MB=3.00022985; MTD=3.00000008; XFM=3.00000015; UTC=2018-08-28 22:46:47 X-IBM-AV-DETECTION: SAVI=unused REMOTE=unused XFE=unused x-cbparentid: 18082822-0073-0000-0000-0000493BC0A3 Message-Id: <9587f8a2-3130-033c-6394-9110b0d399da@linux.vnet.ibm.com> X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:,, definitions=2018-08-28_09:,, signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1015 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1807170000 definitions=main-1808280220 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 08/28/2018 03:29 PM, Li Yang wrote: > On Tue, Aug 28, 2018 at 5:16 PM Tyrel Datwyler > wrote: >> >> On 08/28/2018 11:48 AM, Li Yang wrote: >>> On Mon, Aug 27, 2018 at 8:57 PM Rob Herring wrote: >>>> >>>> In preparation to remove the node name pointer from struct device_node, >>>> convert printf users to use the %pOFn format specifier. >>> >>> Please forgive my ignorance, but what is this format specifier do >>> exactly? I cannot find anything listed in the printf specification >>> matching this. Is this something newly introduced? >>> >>> Leo >>> >> >> From Documentation/core-api/printk-formats.rst: > > I was trying to find it in the standard c format specifier. :( > Thanks a lot for the pointer. > No problem. Its worth a look through. The usual integer types are at the top, but that is followed by the pointer types which the kernel provides quite a few for a variety of things. >> >> kobjects >> -------- >> >> :: >> >> %pOF[fnpPcCF] >> >> >> For printing kobject based structs (device nodes). Default behaviour is >> equivalent to %pOFf. >> >> - f - device node full_name >> - n - device node name >> - p - device node phandle >> - P - device node path spec (name + @unit) >> - F - device node flags >> - c - major compatible string >> - C - full compatible string >> >> >> -Tyrel >> >