Message-Id: <200311032023.hA3KN3gv000750@turing-police.cc.vt.edu>
To: root@chaos.analogic.com
Cc: Brian Beattie <beattie@beattie-home.net>,
       Linux kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Things that Longhorn seems to be doing right 
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 03 Nov 2003 15:17:55 EST."
             <Pine.LNX.4.53.0311031512170.2654@chaos> 
From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
References: <1067778693.1315.76.camel@kokopelli> <200311021715.hA2HFXr5026778@turing-police.cc.vt.edu> <1067888137.869.26.camel@kokopelli>
            <Pine.LNX.4.53.0311031512170.2654@chaos>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="==_Exmh_-674504270P";
	 micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: Mon, 03 Nov 2003 15:23:02 -0500
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 1027
Lines: 30

--==_Exmh_-674504270P
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

On Mon, 03 Nov 2003 15:17:55 EST, "Richard B. Johnson" said:

> Yeah. Nobody should ever use a word that's spelled like paradigm!
> How about "really good example..." (which is what it means).

No, a paradigm is "a way of looking at things" or "a world view".
So this would include paradigms like "the world is flat" or "monolithic
kernels are preferable" or "gcc is the only compiler for the kernel".

--==_Exmh_-674504270P
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001

iD8DBQE/prkmcC3lWbTT17ARAhyNAJ9vd6BYlGZF4h+Sz7gsKgO5b72IegCg9trq
QHAcQG5IIvAdRG1GoD93eY8=
=OVj1
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--==_Exmh_-674504270P--
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/