Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <0180729200038.11795-1-sravanhome@gmail.com> <20180731194743.13678-1-sravanhome@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <20180731194743.13678-1-sravanhome@gmail.com>
From:   Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Date:   Wed, 29 Aug 2018 09:35:38 +0200
Message-ID: <CACRpkda=q+LZMUN5xJ777ZGWxYRBdZTvG0naNqr5BoLnVQ1=aA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/5] Add Actions Semi S700 pinctrl support
To:     sravanhome@gmail.com
Cc:     Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
        =?UTF-8?Q?Andreas_F=C3=A4rber?= <afaerber@suse.de>,
        Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
        Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
        "open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org>,
        "open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS" 
        <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>, pn@denx.de,
        mp-cs@actions-semi.com, Jeff Chen <jeff.chen@actions-semi.com>,
        "Thomas C. Liau" <thomas.liau@actions-semi.com>,
        linux@cubietech.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, Jul 31, 2018 at 9:48 PM Saravanan Sekar <sravanhome@gmail.com> wrote:

> This patchset adds pinctrl support for Actions Semi S700 SoC.
> Pinmux functions are only accessible for pin groups while pinconf
> parameters are available for both pin groups and individual pins.
>
> pinctrl driver is verified using the Cubieboard7.
>
> common functionalities from s900 is moved for all Actions Semi
> SoC's usage.
> Common pad control configurations are moved to SoC specific
>
> dts entry for pinctrl depends on clock driver which is still under review:
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10533959/

So what is the status of this patch set?

I am happy to apply it once you have the right buildtime dependencies
and Manivannan's ACK on the patch set! (Looks good to me.)

Maybe you want to rebase on v4.19-rc1 and resend as v5 before
I do that though?

Yours,
Linus Walleij