Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 23 Mar 2001 04:31:50 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 23 Mar 2001 04:31:40 -0500 Received: from t2.redhat.com ([199.183.24.243]:13815 "EHLO meme.surrey.redhat.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 23 Mar 2001 04:31:29 -0500 Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2001 09:29:57 +0000 From: Tim Waugh To: "J . A . Magallon" Cc: Alan Cox , Linux Kernel Subject: Re: [PATCH] gcc-3.0 warnings Message-ID: <20010323092957.F1469@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20010323011140.A1176@werewolf.able.es> <20010323013800.A1918@werewolf.able.es> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <20010323013800.A1918@werewolf.able.es>; from jamagallon@able.es on Fri, Mar 23, 2001 at 01:38:00AM +0100 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Mar 23, 2001 at 01:38:00AM +0100, J . A . Magallon wrote: > Yes, a null sentence can shut up the compiler. But what is the purpose of > a jump to the end instead of a return ? Some optimization ? So that when someone decides that the function needs to do some extra initialisation at the beginning and some extra cleanup at the end, they don't accidentally miss an exit point. Tim. */ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/