Received: by 2002:ac0:a5a6:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id m35-v6csp396461imm; Wed, 29 Aug 2018 02:50:01 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ANB0VdZlyZszxQb598zuTcuHsnmvKKVpSEOufalmvzuA5My+HvtuUQg8Q9LoE6X+lA0/F7OhICyS X-Received: by 2002:a65:5144:: with SMTP id g4-v6mr4904492pgq.21.1535536201749; Wed, 29 Aug 2018 02:50:01 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1535536201; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=NDRoy2E0Pi+JttKibbeXcll6RLweLiOOOA8TrugcNmFfqcw7FjyO9BvwZNl0Tu24Pe U0zRuv0FLivpBk4WL5ydSXHiKUcFUqUk5ckO6icblXRgkfX/ksWuaQ4OiKaDf7Z9SpWe Z09SCS8A+yQDdhuKPfhQhrZ7Q787H5tHbjscYmYkR2EMe99VHdZRXGIHoqzFSWcg2pbn CHDXSDVTQwXJW5Ow+Gi8LKNZ+4mRVzX+uS81Hs2Ev/j/dOa1FrkHVlRKsm5L+k92NuAi l86s7yv6mZ0AmOkeaFNyDWElVK4keZSeCH038NhKimpGtcpUepHwxq2ajLMQqavK+m5B DwwA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :references:in-reply-to:mime-version:dkim-signature :arc-authentication-results; bh=9a7lUEbXTjwMgOCV9bB64zBe17Mkn092sQB9NT2hLHA=; b=x+n1wlRENzbxPkAN0+/oGjXeWcRZ4NXg9LT32+YYP0RcCMBgS78/WLhY1vZ8eAdWMK 05uk1G1DKKPy206tAWKj+H9o2E23n2gGsCGvInO0ciEhoazAis9qACzGhSIsfxhnDtuQ DTevYW1K146IvXg9SrmBJv44Og3hN1S2sgBaQk+Y/n6XxXdfk0DZtR7NEeTokbeTY95b c0Z9SBjxCtcNz2if3zeF9M20BLF/4wQ4bEHJnETzV/ZR58ntypQkrP5X30uKgv0SM7Km oOT3TFZ8ZdmxLtgcn7uLp2kFmuQNh4ioYk2c/y+5uXS02Pl+HJtW4O/YLzAdUPyjk8F6 gtIw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@linaro.org header.s=google header.b=gh7u3TN3; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=linaro.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id y22-v6si3456841pgj.436.2018.08.29.02.49.45; Wed, 29 Aug 2018 02:50:01 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@linaro.org header.s=google header.b=gh7u3TN3; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=linaro.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727565AbeH2Noo (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 29 Aug 2018 09:44:44 -0400 Received: from mail-oi0-f68.google.com ([209.85.218.68]:46078 "EHLO mail-oi0-f68.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727099AbeH2Noo (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 Aug 2018 09:44:44 -0400 Received: by mail-oi0-f68.google.com with SMTP id t68-v6so8001526oie.12 for ; Wed, 29 Aug 2018 02:48:38 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=9a7lUEbXTjwMgOCV9bB64zBe17Mkn092sQB9NT2hLHA=; b=gh7u3TN3zrsvbRhW3JQfG+5+++gfYEa9YRflkyfWeOMpbiTPZ1qkHXxW+fE1xG4JOY UKa09uT9+FPFRBSuh0Zmb8MRp2GATK2BTWcvT3shvGoR6YuBE20vwj1J7nP7xUNO0DwM xPf+L3lfjseZa672gIgqmTI/lDyaQNv9gVcWE= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=9a7lUEbXTjwMgOCV9bB64zBe17Mkn092sQB9NT2hLHA=; b=fCtAe1Lq+kc7jZKkv6ni7niar6dTSchYfcHwqnl6hetLLgeIjucKc+B11NOAwXootN YR+s+PPuddFozSMUy2zSpN3LH+eT80Mpt4qUQHbE6YdiKICFXEsPJ/KMcX4u5iXzthTR kHKEz0wQktg3BHv4I6pkpzIvwxeCliD9gSdUcjzRKWTvm41GGygn5NujACOOP9iakzob RFLQGiYbogH0RrfoV3NzqTiGQQK6QkkP4Tx47VnFzrOHSdqlCmrdWxPKOSnuxu6aNH6o ru6eXpMnMZt/6LCO6M10aZNdWcxBV9lWDqokmMlUWIb8ulq5f76SxIpOYEK87HDvnZrf zsOA== X-Gm-Message-State: APzg51C7eFTOtYOAu6SvMzVa868pxpWZOmn7sVWXJDCHNT8hMZSgOu4y +1qjAdLRFggmHIW0HKyBS8iH85uQMQ/wRQ17nXKjMdvy9do= X-Received: by 2002:aca:5b57:: with SMTP id p84-v6mr2012601oib.109.1535536118524; Wed, 29 Aug 2018 02:48:38 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 2002:a9d:29:0:0:0:0:0 with HTTP; Wed, 29 Aug 2018 02:48:37 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <52eb7b5f-a405-06d1-2758-f27401a3ce3b@gmail.com> References: <1dc5d394324b2bf1ffe229b8e42691fab6d749e0.1533556992.git.baolin.wang@linaro.org> <20180824101145.GA1510@amd> <9bb7ac19-36a6-d11a-6d46-fc65c2026201@gmail.com> <20180824201227.GB17146@amd> <52eb7b5f-a405-06d1-2758-f27401a3ce3b@gmail.com> From: Baolin Wang Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2018 17:48:37 +0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/2] leds: core: Introduce LED pattern trigger To: Jacek Anaszewski Cc: Pavel Machek , rteysseyre@gmail.com, Bjorn Andersson , Mark Brown , Linux LED Subsystem , LKML Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Jacek, On 29 August 2018 at 04:25, Jacek Anaszewski wrote: > On 08/25/2018 09:51 AM, Baolin Wang wrote: >> On 25 August 2018 at 04:44, Jacek Anaszewski wrote: >>> On 08/24/2018 10:12 PM, Pavel Machek wrote: >>>> On Fri 2018-08-24 21:49:50, Jacek Anaszewski wrote: >>>>> Hi Pavel, >>>>> >>>>> On 08/24/2018 12:11 PM, Pavel Machek wrote: >>>>>> Hi! >>>>>> >>>>>>> I think that it would be more flexible if software pattern fallback >>>>>>> was applied in case of pattern_set failure. Otherwise, it would >>>>>>> lead to the situation where LED class devices that support hardware >>>>>>> blinking couldn't be applied the same set of patterns as LED class >>>>>>> devices that don't implement pattern_set. The latter will always have to >>>>>>> resort to using software pattern engine which will accept far greater >>>>>>> amount of pattern combinations. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> In this case we need to discuss on what basis the decision will be >>>>>>> made on whether hardware or software engine will be used. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Possible options coming to mind: >>>>>>> - an interface will be provided to determine max difference between >>>>>>> the settings supported by the hardware and the settings requested by >>>>>>> the user, that will result in aligning user's setting to the hardware >>>>>>> capabilities >>>>>>> - the above alignment rate will be predefined instead >>>>>>> - hardware engine will be used only if user requests supported settings >>>>>>> on the whole span of the requested pattern >>>>>>> - in each of the above cases it would be worth to think of the >>>>>>> interface to show the scope of the settings supported by hardware >>>>>> >>>>>> I'd recommend keeping it simple. We use hardware engine if driver >>>>>> author thinks pattern is "close enough". >>>>> >>>>> The thing is that in the ledtrig-pattern v5 implementation there >>>>> is no option of using software fallback if pattern_set op >>>>> is initialized: >>>>> >>>>> + if (led_cdev->pattern_set) { >>>>> + return led_cdev->pattern_set(led_cdev, data->patterns, >>>>> + data->npatterns, data->repeat); >>>>> + } >>>> >>>> Yeah, that sounds wrong. (Sorry I did not pay enough attention). >>>> >>>> It pattern_set() returns special error code, it should just continue >>>> and use software pattern fallback. >>> >>> And now we can get back to the issue I was concerned about in the >>> email you replied to, i.e. what series of [brightness delta_t] tuples >>> should be written to the pattern file to enable hardware breathing >>> engine. >> >> OK. So now we've made a consensus to use the software pattern fallback >> if failed to set hardware pattern. How about introduce one interface >> to convert hardware patterns to software patterns if necessary? >> >> diff --git a/drivers/leds/trigger/ledtrig-pattern.c >> b/drivers/leds/trigger/ledtrig-pattern.c >> index 63b94a2..d46a641 100644 >> --- a/drivers/leds/trigger/ledtrig-pattern.c >> +++ b/drivers/leds/trigger/ledtrig-pattern.c >> @@ -66,8 +66,15 @@ static int pattern_trig_start_pattern(struct >> pattern_trig_data *data, >> return 0; >> >> if (led_cdev->pattern_set) { >> - return led_cdev->pattern_set(led_cdev, data->patterns, >> - data->npatterns, data->repeat); >> + ret = led_cdev->pattern_set(led_cdev, data->patterns, >> + data->npatterns, data->repeat); >> + if (!ret) >> + return 0; >> + >> + dev_warn(led_cdev->dev, "Failed to set hardware pattern\n"); >> + >> + if (led_cdev->pattern_convert) >> + led_cdev->pattern_convert(led_cdev, > > I can't see how it could help to assess if hw pattern > engine can launch given pattern, and with what accuracy. > > Instead, I propose to add a means for defining whether the pattern > to be set is intended for hardware pattern engine or for software > fallback. It could be either separate sysfs file e.g. hw_pattern, > or a modifier to the pattern written to the pattern file, e,g, > > echo "hw 100 2 200 3 100 2" > pattern > > hw format expected by given driver would have to be described > in the per-driver ABI documentation. All patterns without > "hw" prefix would enable software pattern engine. OK. So I did some optimization based on v5 according to suggestion, if you think this is okay for you, then I will send out the formal v6 patch set. 1. echo "hw 100 2 200 3 100 2" > pattern Only for hardware pattern, if failed, we will return error number. 2. echo "100 2 200 3 100 2" > pattern Will try to set hardware pattern firstly, if failed, will use software pattern instead. diff --git a/drivers/leds/trigger/ledtrig-pattern.c b/drivers/leds/trigger/ledtrig-pattern.c index 63b94a2..f08e797 100644 --- a/drivers/leds/trigger/ledtrig-pattern.c +++ b/drivers/leds/trigger/ledtrig-pattern.c @@ -26,6 +26,7 @@ struct pattern_trig_data { u32 repeat; u32 last_repeat; bool is_indefinite; + bool is_hw_pattern; struct timer_list timer; }; @@ -62,12 +63,21 @@ static void pattern_trig_timer_function(struct timer_list *t) static int pattern_trig_start_pattern(struct pattern_trig_data *data, struct led_classdev *led_cdev) { + int ret; + if (!data->npatterns) return 0; if (led_cdev->pattern_set) { - return led_cdev->pattern_set(led_cdev, data->patterns, + ret = led_cdev->pattern_set(led_cdev, data->patterns, data->npatterns, data->repeat); + if (!ret) + return 0; + + dev_warn(led_cdev->dev, "Failed to set hardware patterns\n"); + + if (data->is_hw_pattern) + return ret; } data->curr = data->patterns; @@ -106,7 +116,7 @@ static ssize_t repeat_store(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr, if (err) return err; - if (!led_cdev->pattern_set) + if (!data->is_hw_pattern) del_timer_sync(&data->timer); mutex_lock(&data->lock); @@ -159,19 +169,32 @@ static ssize_t pattern_store(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr, { struct led_classdev *led_cdev = dev_get_drvdata(dev); struct pattern_trig_data *data = led_cdev->trigger_data; - int ccount, cr, offset = 0, err = 0; + int ccount, cr, len, offset = 0, err = 0; + const char *s; - if (!led_cdev->pattern_set) + if (!data->is_hw_pattern) del_timer_sync(&data->timer); mutex_lock(&data->lock); + s = strstr(buf, "hw"); + if (s && led_cdev->pattern_set) { + data->is_hw_pattern = true; + s += strlen("hw"); + len = strlen(s); + } else { + data->is_hw_pattern = false; + s = buf; + len = count; + } + data->npatterns = 0; - while (offset < count - 1 && data->npatterns < MAX_PATTERNS) { + while (offset < len - 1 && data->npatterns < MAX_PATTERNS) { cr = 0; - ccount = sscanf(buf + offset, "%d %d %n", + ccount = sscanf(s + offset, "%d %d %n", &data->patterns[data->npatterns].brightness, &data->patterns[data->npatterns].delta_t, &cr); if (ccount != 2) { data->npatterns = 0; err = -EINVAL; @@ -232,7 +255,8 @@ static void pattern_trig_deactivate(struct led_classdev *led_cdev) if (led_cdev->pattern_clear) led_cdev->pattern_clear(led_cdev); - else + + if (!data->is_hw_pattern) del_timer_sync(&data->timer); led_set_brightness(led_cdev, LED_OFF); > >> data->patterns, &data->npatterns); >> } >> >> data->curr = data->patterns; >> @@ -106,8 +113,7 @@ static ssize_t repeat_store(struct device *dev, >> struct device_attribute *attr, >> if (err) >> return err; >> >> - if (!led_cdev->pattern_set) >> - del_timer_sync(&data->timer); >> + del_timer_sync(&data->timer); >> >> mutex_lock(&data->lock); >> >> @@ -161,8 +167,7 @@ static ssize_t pattern_store(struct device *dev, >> struct device_attribute *attr, >> struct pattern_trig_data *data = led_cdev->trigger_data; >> int ccount, cr, offset = 0, err = 0; >> >> - if (!led_cdev->pattern_set) >> - del_timer_sync(&data->timer); >> + del_timer_sync(&data->timer); >> >> mutex_lock(&data->lock); >> >> @@ -232,9 +237,8 @@ static void pattern_trig_deactivate(struct >> led_classdev *led_cdev) >> >> if (led_cdev->pattern_clear) >> led_cdev->pattern_clear(led_cdev); >> - else >> - del_timer_sync(&data->timer); >> >> + del_timer_sync(&data->timer); >> led_set_brightness(led_cdev, LED_OFF); >> kfree(data); >> led_cdev->activated = false; >> diff --git a/include/linux/leds.h b/include/linux/leds.h >> index 74fc2c6..04f3eaf 100644 >> --- a/include/linux/leds.h >> +++ b/include/linux/leds.h >> @@ -93,6 +93,8 @@ struct led_classdev { >> struct led_pattern *pattern, int len, >> unsigned int repeat); >> int (*pattern_clear)(struct led_classdev *led_cdev); >> + int (*pattern_convert)(struct led_classdev *led_cdev, >> + struct led_pattern *pattern, int *len); >> >> struct device *dev; >> const struct attribute_group **groups; >> > > -- > Best regards, > Jacek Anaszewski -- Baolin Wang Best Regards