Received: by 2002:ac0:a5a6:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id m35-v6csp677631imm; Wed, 29 Aug 2018 09:23:37 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ANB0VdZTcxssBZUkdBkCgsCAgMxt6XcHcqB0gdcAC3mkwmbGB4s4WkmDiERPsohIiWy8OUrhsui8 X-Received: by 2002:a63:81c3:: with SMTP id t186-v6mr6346312pgd.285.1535559817886; Wed, 29 Aug 2018 09:23:37 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1535559817; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=usYK6bzuYBIJRMM7pD6FROkkKYmhMHU22yzxix5o9/PE8laxYKPkpNWVpt2ooXDTkG zopWutE6xADUnx38boJxAEtw160rcmdU51WGlECfswvR63jkyhJ75LlkqQ2IStB3UkVx /e2LZ1jMzYBfnZOigdUwncQTm/uGygPMy/yeLNkvr8InBi8OeweQnrZyPCpSX3aSMyp5 H+ZVHI+MjBK9LkGw10wSQ2actc9LTGJyUERzJJKhsGqJujVH3C7jT7MIqrXXfCTgO/dG i/ggaZrWPe4rzVGP+joAZaFgKmq08t+xEbeEPeizhghNVmkMtS5r4O0hYk7ofPP+d3gk Rplg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:from:date:dkim-signature:arc-authentication-results; bh=tG5g4n7KVWZdo0J0rYwuPz8WHEJK77ciVa5K8s/oktY=; b=pc1B2Tzer7pcXg/p47UxaNMV5NKz8rsYwgIrW6/ZB8ltCKtExpcNyV8nc/Lndatbne P0Vb9tNT7M2Uv23+6IcEotOFtR88arX7I6XqPYJZJ7wW1fLIvjEWlfHoO1nWCzQVHiKb 8Mk0w+TxmsgywiX/dPu5DA3QHt188gCXNAoULLslUzD+mv6oSIt4QK37n6dtADJCBGTA GBw8z/U5VPA+zSaae3thZmHe/D0b0OaXUN5O0Ekx2+vJm1a+u8jz4CY4guFx1s5d5AeM 2/z85sVFCfy0SjJWGIGEknRcrx6zM6t1eItThhcdghglhQ0W+Kvlfr32PrqioCZeGhhx F/xw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel.org header.s=default header.b=eIesr9zm; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id h2-v6si4295687pgk.330.2018.08.29.09.23.22; Wed, 29 Aug 2018 09:23:37 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel.org header.s=default header.b=eIesr9zm; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729261AbeH2UTw (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 29 Aug 2018 16:19:52 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:38788 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728976AbeH2UTw (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 Aug 2018 16:19:52 -0400 Received: from localhost (unknown [171.76.77.239]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4566D2064A; Wed, 29 Aug 2018 16:22:10 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1535559731; bh=GBA/+p0BFmUBOYJ3/byXaS9U30JNEZ7reCjjuT7vzyA=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=eIesr9zmMLBsl0BWAoJYHI1w5gO4b6Qahi05FrTLM6giFhGDVrw/ZDAiOOoSCMH4o 0AdXngXuM1vGn8a9R2iwXbn7oLWeJo/QMSnXkhf5NDWIyaIAslcE+tcce+NX0WpTWY Ne8ETl3JhrXal6upxU/zX3YxF8D+1WtCDf6RNJ5U= Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2018 21:52:02 +0530 From: Vinod To: Peter Ujfalusi Cc: dan.j.williams@intel.com, dmaengine@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, lars@metafoo.de, radheys@xilinx.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] dmaengine: Add metadata_ops for dma_async_tx_descriptor Message-ID: <20180829162202.GI2388@vkoul-mobl> References: <20180823130728.20506-1-peter.ujfalusi@ti.com> <20180829155212.GG2388@vkoul-mobl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.2 (2017-12-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 29-08-18, 19:14, Peter Ujfalusi wrote: > Vinod, > > On 08/29/2018 06:52 PM, Vinod wrote: > > On 23-08-18, 16:07, Peter Ujfalusi wrote: > >> The metadata is best described as side band data or parameters traveling > >> alongside the data DMAd by the DMA engine. It is data > >> which is understood by the peripheral and the peripheral driver only, the > >> DMA engine see it only as data block and it is not interpreting it in any > >> way. > >> > >> The metadata can be different per descriptor as it is a parameter for the > >> data being transferred. > >> > >> If the DMA supports per descriptor metadata it can implement the attach, > >> get_ptr/set_len callbacks. > >> > >> Client drivers must only use either attach or get_ptr/set_len to avoid > >> miss configuration. > > > > misconfiguration? > > Sorry for the typos, I'll got through them again. > > >> Client driver can check if a given metadata mode is supported by the > >> channel during probe time with > >> dmaengine_is_metadata_mode_supported(chan, DESC_METADATA_CLIENT); > >> dmaengine_is_metadata_mode_supported(chan, DESC_METADATA_ENGINE); > >> > >> and based on this information can use either mode. > >> > >> Wrappers are also added for the metadata_ops. > >> > >> To be used in DESC_METADATA_CLIENT mode: > >> dmaengine_desc_attach_metadata() > >> > >> To be used in DESC_METADATA_ENGINE mode: > >> dmaengine_desc_get_metadata_ptr() > >> dmaengine_desc_set_metadata_len() > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Peter Ujfalusi > >> --- > >> Hi, > >> > >> Changes since rfc: > >> - DESC_METADATA_EMBEDDED renamed to DESC_METADATA_ENGINE > >> - Use flow is added for both CLIENT and ENGINE metadata modes > >> > >> Regards, > >> Peter > >> > >> include/linux/dmaengine.h | 144 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > >> 1 file changed, 144 insertions(+) > >> > >> diff --git a/include/linux/dmaengine.h b/include/linux/dmaengine.h > >> index 3db833a8c542..f809635cfeaa 100644 > >> --- a/include/linux/dmaengine.h > >> +++ b/include/linux/dmaengine.h > >> @@ -231,6 +231,57 @@ typedef struct { DECLARE_BITMAP(bits, DMA_TX_TYPE_END); } dma_cap_mask_t; > >> * @bytes_transferred: byte counter > >> */ > >> > >> +/** > >> + * enum dma_desc_metadata_mode - per descriptor metadata mode types supported > >> + * @DESC_METADATA_CLIENT - the metadata buffer is allocated/provided by the > >> + * client driver and it is attached (via the dmaengine_desc_attach_metadata() > >> + * helper) to the descriptor. > >> + * > >> + * Client drivers interested to use this mode can follow: > >> + * - DMA_MEM_TO_DEV: > >> + * 1. prepare the descriptor (dmaengine_prep_*) > >> + * construct the metadata in the clinet's buffer > > > > typo clinet > > > >> + * 2. use dmaengine_desc_attach_metadata() to attach the buffer to the > >> + * descriptor > >> + * 3. submit the transfer > >> + * - DMA_DEV_TO_MEM: > >> + * 1. prepare the descriptor (dmaengine_prep_*) > >> + * 2. use dmaengine_desc_attach_metadata() to attach the buffer to the > >> + * descriptor > >> + * 3. submit the transfer > >> + * 4. when the transfer is completed, the metadata should be available in the > >> + * attached buffer > > > > I guess this is good to be moved into Documentation > > Should I create a new file for metadata? I guess it would make sense as the > information is for both clients and engines. Hmm not sure, lets see how it looks as entries in these files, detailing roles of clients and providers > > > > > also we dont allow this for memcpy txn? > > I have not thought about that, but if I think about it it should be along the > same lines as MEM_TO_DEV. > I'll add the MEM_TO_MEM as well to the documentation. Okay and lets not implement it then.. > > >> + * > >> + * @DESC_METADATA_ENGINE - the metadata buffer is allocated/managed by the DMA > >> + * driver. The client driver can ask for the pointer, maximum size and the > >> + * currently used size of the metadata and can directly update or read it. > >> + * dmaengine_desc_get_metadata_ptr() and dmaengine_desc_set_metadata_len() is > >> + * provided as helper functions. > >> + * > >> + * Client drivers interested to use this mode can follow: > >> + * - DMA_MEM_TO_DEV: > >> + * 1. prepare the descriptor (dmaengine_prep_*) > >> + * 2. use dmaengine_desc_get_metadata_ptr() to get the pointer to the engine's > >> + * metadata area > >> + * 3. update the metadata at the pointer > >> + * 4. use dmaengine_desc_set_metadata_len() to tell the DMA engine the amount > >> + * of data the client has placed into the metadata buffer > >> + * 5. submit the transfer > >> + * - DMA_DEV_TO_MEM: > >> + * 1. prepare the descriptor (dmaengine_prep_*) > >> + * 2. submit the transfer > >> + * 3. on transfer completion, use dmaengine_desc_get_metadata_ptr() to get the > >> + * pointer to the engine's metadata are > >> + * 4. Read out the metadate from the pointer > >> + * > >> + * Note: the two mode is not compatible and clients must use one mode for a > >> + * descriptor. > >> + */ > >> +enum dma_desc_metadata_mode { > >> + DESC_METADATA_CLIENT = (1 << 0), > >> + DESC_METADATA_ENGINE = (1 << 1), > > > > BIT(x) > > OK, I followed what we have in the header to not mix (1 << x) and BIT(x) yeah lets update :) > > > > >> +}; > >> + > >> struct dma_chan_percpu { > >> /* stats */ > >> unsigned long memcpy_count; > >> @@ -494,6 +545,18 @@ struct dmaengine_unmap_data { > >> dma_addr_t addr[0]; > >> }; > >> > >> +struct dma_async_tx_descriptor; > >> + > >> +struct dma_descriptor_metadata_ops { > >> + int (*attach)(struct dma_async_tx_descriptor *desc, void *data, > >> + size_t len); > >> + > >> + void *(*get_ptr)(struct dma_async_tx_descriptor *desc, > >> + size_t *payload_len, size_t *max_len); > >> + int (*set_len)(struct dma_async_tx_descriptor *desc, > >> + size_t payload_len); > >> +}; > >> + > >> /** > >> * struct dma_async_tx_descriptor - async transaction descriptor > >> * ---dma generic offload fields--- > >> @@ -523,6 +586,8 @@ struct dma_async_tx_descriptor { > >> dma_async_tx_callback_result callback_result; > >> void *callback_param; > >> struct dmaengine_unmap_data *unmap; > >> + enum dma_desc_metadata_mode desc_metadata_mode; > >> + struct dma_descriptor_metadata_ops *metadata_ops; > > I forgot to update the comment section for the dma_async_tx_descriptor, I'll > address it in v2. > > >> #ifdef CONFIG_ASYNC_TX_ENABLE_CHANNEL_SWITCH > >> struct dma_async_tx_descriptor *next; > >> struct dma_async_tx_descriptor *parent; > >> @@ -685,6 +750,7 @@ struct dma_filter { > >> * @global_node: list_head for global dma_device_list > >> * @filter: information for device/slave to filter function/param mapping > >> * @cap_mask: one or more dma_capability flags > >> + * @desc_metadata_modes: supported metadata modes by the DMA device > >> * @max_xor: maximum number of xor sources, 0 if no capability > >> * @max_pq: maximum number of PQ sources and PQ-continue capability > >> * @copy_align: alignment shift for memcpy operations > >> @@ -749,6 +815,7 @@ struct dma_device { > >> struct list_head global_node; > >> struct dma_filter filter; > >> dma_cap_mask_t cap_mask; > >> + enum dma_desc_metadata_mode desc_metadata_modes; > >> unsigned short max_xor; > >> unsigned short max_pq; > >> enum dmaengine_alignment copy_align; > >> @@ -935,6 +1002,83 @@ static inline struct dma_async_tx_descriptor *dmaengine_prep_dma_memcpy( > >> len, flags); > >> } > >> > >> +static inline bool dmaengine_is_metadata_mode_supported(struct dma_chan *chan, > >> + enum dma_desc_metadata_mode mode) > >> +{ > >> + return !!(chan->device->desc_metadata_modes & mode); > >> +} > >> + > >> +static inline int _desc_check_and_set_metadata_mode( > > > > why does this need to start with _ ? > > To scare people to use in client code ;) Lets not expose to them :D > > > > >> + struct dma_async_tx_descriptor *desc, enum dma_desc_metadata_mode mode) > >> +{ > >> + /* Make sure that the metadata mode is not mixed */ > >> + if (!desc->desc_metadata_mode) { > >> + if (dmaengine_is_metadata_mode_supported(desc->chan, mode)) > >> + desc->desc_metadata_mode = mode; > >> + else > >> + return -ENOTSUPP; > >> + } else if (desc->desc_metadata_mode != mode) { > >> + return -EINVAL; > >> + } > >> + > >> + return 0; > >> +} > >> + > >> +static inline int dmaengine_desc_attach_metadata( > >> + struct dma_async_tx_descriptor *desc, void *data, size_t len) > >> +{ > >> + int ret; > >> + > >> + if (!desc) > >> + return -EINVAL; > >> + > >> + ret = _desc_check_and_set_metadata_mode(desc, DESC_METADATA_CLIENT); > >> + if (ret) > >> + return ret; > >> + > >> + if (!desc->metadata_ops || !desc->metadata_ops->attach) > >> + return -ENOTSUPP; > >> + > >> + return desc->metadata_ops->attach(desc, data, len); > >> +} > >> + > >> +static inline void *dmaengine_desc_get_metadata_ptr( > >> + struct dma_async_tx_descriptor *desc, size_t *payload_len, > >> + size_t *max_len) > >> +{ > >> + int ret; > >> + > >> + if (!desc) > >> + return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL); > >> + > >> + ret = _desc_check_and_set_metadata_mode(desc, DESC_METADATA_ENGINE); > >> + if (ret) > >> + return ERR_PTR(ret); > >> + > >> + if (!desc->metadata_ops || !desc->metadata_ops->get_ptr) > >> + return ERR_PTR(-ENOTSUPP); > >> + > >> + return desc->metadata_ops->get_ptr(desc, payload_len, max_len); > >> +} > >> + > >> +static inline int dmaengine_desc_set_metadata_len( > >> + struct dma_async_tx_descriptor *desc, size_t payload_len) > >> +{ > >> + int ret; > >> + > >> + if (!desc) > >> + return -EINVAL; > >> + > >> + ret = _desc_check_and_set_metadata_mode(desc, DESC_METADATA_ENGINE); > >> + if (ret) > >> + return ret; > >> + > >> + if (!desc->metadata_ops || !desc->metadata_ops->set_len) > >> + return -ENOTSUPP; > >> + > >> + return desc->metadata_ops->set_len(desc, payload_len); > >> +} > > > > thats bit too much code for a header file :( Lets move it to C file > > please. We can utilize local dmaengine.h and not expose all these and > > possible misuse by clients > > OK, I have thought about that as well. > > > Also I would like to see a use :-) before further comments. > > You mean the DMA driver and at least one client? DMA driver to _at_least_ start with. Client even better > I have the DMA driver in my public facing branch [1], but it is not an easy > read with it's close to 4k loc. It doesnt exist :P > The client is not in my branch and it is actually using an older version of > the metadata support. > > The problem is that I don't know when I will be able to send the driver for > review as all of this is targeting a brand new SoC (AM654) with completely new > data movement architecture. There are lots of dependencies still need to be > upstreamed before I can send something which at least compiles. > > I can offer snippets from the client driver, if that is good enough or a link > to the public tree where it can be accessed, but it is not going to go > upstream before the DMA driver. TBH that's not going to help much, lets come back to it when you need this upstream. -- ~Vinod