Received: by 2002:ac0:a5a6:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id m35-v6csp113306imm; Wed, 29 Aug 2018 15:33:31 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ANB0VdYoo+FcM0+oZW3lEfHQkA/+vDwGpSdcbm8i3RGuLbInStJ5tn1m5MgnLaapSrMBkSTsCrq3 X-Received: by 2002:a62:2744:: with SMTP id n65-v6mr7822739pfn.125.1535582011129; Wed, 29 Aug 2018 15:33:31 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1535582011; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=xyhbV1ETNAMZoOkS9YZ5aFKetfh5vkiW6U1II3FeTIZdeXZvifDROzGFFetomTNDGB AYCiOE6jYUCbim1hJxXZI4RY1vMkwmNGiRnZlOoVCryL1N0XwUErLDrE63lqSnkhn8Co TaoN32mjuP+OTWvFXq0N/CuImgKFQpdMsDMlpKJ4uNNmspGgg9VJ1VscA/Xp5fRalXEG /bKNqgpu/0vSgotSCZ7FuLq3JA3gz9bGWexCUbSGPYbb7E8ncQPoFXDvPiPItab8/L5a LOXbTSVlamZz3ob5+9xhwXJhivsIcbfiHA5MHUNIuBb/oSDxyjguklMKqLOslTROu5YF HFpQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:message-id:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-disposition:mime-version:references:reply-to:subject:cc:to :from:date:arc-authentication-results; bh=CGZmp4e43sFWpNWdyaGFy+RXWgR2+Yxb/e2vwzPedhg=; b=fhQ5O8rror9NLOIVHh/qHPjnRAtmuciR49e7FXlYEtYAKzFaQStsq2yRdj9xjH5C75 P15H6zpIEUKv3WN7igFi1FnSKW5qajDoWOO9kW1pDhkPx7wnUnkqOVgXK4x6mj8YnSPM 41htPVfprjJZKKXC2xjewjpstQNs64oBVZe47zu/qdpMFXVs2dJ6h2t4OQV34S2ebnLQ IJcR7ks45avZ1Va3CzbEPybsvUv43u0OZzRKUhzz1jU9qkdfCtL/iBmrTmd+q0aPCPkr 6SpkJZTvK0RB5aonGMOKJ+jHoYC2MB2zsjuLwirc9kMREX0a5BJPKp5dLbZ+N5q/FWg+ ebzg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ibm.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id v36-v6si4670925pga.336.2018.08.29.15.33.15; Wed, 29 Aug 2018 15:33:31 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ibm.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727725AbeH3CVU (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 29 Aug 2018 22:21:20 -0400 Received: from mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.158.5]:60858 "EHLO mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727294AbeH3CVT (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 Aug 2018 22:21:19 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098419.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.22/8.16.0.22) with SMTP id w7TMIibc038604 for ; Wed, 29 Aug 2018 18:22:20 -0400 Received: from e16.ny.us.ibm.com (e16.ny.us.ibm.com [129.33.205.206]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2m62g7uc22-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Wed, 29 Aug 2018 18:22:20 -0400 Received: from localhost by e16.ny.us.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Wed, 29 Aug 2018 18:22:19 -0400 Received: from b01cxnp22033.gho.pok.ibm.com (9.57.198.23) by e16.ny.us.ibm.com (146.89.104.203) with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted; (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256/256) Wed, 29 Aug 2018 18:22:14 -0400 Received: from b01ledav003.gho.pok.ibm.com (b01ledav003.gho.pok.ibm.com [9.57.199.108]) by b01cxnp22033.gho.pok.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id w7TMMEaR46727296 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Wed, 29 Aug 2018 22:22:14 GMT Received: from b01ledav003.gho.pok.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDC1DB2064; Wed, 29 Aug 2018 18:21:09 -0400 (EDT) Received: from b01ledav003.gho.pok.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCDB0B2067; Wed, 29 Aug 2018 18:21:09 -0400 (EDT) Received: from paulmck-ThinkPad-W541 (unknown [9.70.82.159]) by b01ledav003.gho.pok.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Wed, 29 Aug 2018 18:21:09 -0400 (EDT) Received: by paulmck-ThinkPad-W541 (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 3B8EB16C91B7; Wed, 29 Aug 2018 15:22:14 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2018 15:22:14 -0700 From: "Paul E. McKenney" To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: mingo@kernel.org, jiangshanlai@gmail.com, dipankar@in.ibm.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com, josh@joshtriplett.org, tglx@linutronix.de, peterz@infradead.org, rostedt@goodmis.org, dhowells@redhat.com, edumazet@google.com, fweisbec@gmail.com, oleg@redhat.com, joel@joelfernandes.org Subject: Re: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 0/19] RCU flavor-consolidation changes for v4.20/v5.0 Reply-To: paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com References: <20180829222021.GA29944@linux.vnet.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20180829222021.GA29944@linux.vnet.ibm.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 x-cbid: 18082922-0072-0000-0000-000003996727 X-IBM-SpamModules-Scores: X-IBM-SpamModules-Versions: BY=3.00009636; HX=3.00000242; KW=3.00000007; PH=3.00000004; SC=3.00000266; SDB=6.01080739; UDB=6.00557494; IPR=6.00860724; MB=3.00023001; MTD=3.00000008; XFM=3.00000015; UTC=2018-08-29 22:22:18 X-IBM-AV-DETECTION: SAVI=unused REMOTE=unused XFE=unused x-cbparentid: 18082922-0073-0000-0000-0000493EABFA Message-Id: <20180829222214.GA19014@linux.vnet.ibm.com> X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:,, definitions=2018-08-29_06:,, signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=1 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1015 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1807170000 definitions=main-1808290217 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Aug 29, 2018 at 03:20:21PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > Hello! > > This series contains the RCU flavor consolidation, along with some initial > cleanup work enabled by that consolidation (and some that became apparent > while cleaning up): > > 1. Refactor rcu_{nmi,irq}_{enter,exit}(), saving a branch on the > idle entry/exit hotpaths, courtesy of Byungchul Park, > > 2. Defer reporting RCU-preempt quiescent states when disabled. > This is the key commit that consolidates the RCU-bh and RCU-sched > flavors into RCU, however, the RCU-bh and RCU-sched flavors > still exist independently as well at this point. > > 3. Test extended "rcu" read-side critical sections. This commit > causes rcutorture to test RCU's new-found ability to act as > the combination of RCU, RCU-bh, and RCU-sched. > > 4. Allow processing deferred QSes for exiting RCU-preempt readers. > This is a optimization. > > 5. Remove now-unused ->b.exp_need_qs field from the rcu_special union. > > 6. Add warning to detect half-interrupts. Test the claim that > the Linux kernel no longer does half-interrupts. > > 7. Apply RCU-bh QSes to RCU-sched and RCU-preempt when safe, that is, > make the consolidated RCU inherit RCU-bh's denial-of-service > avoidance mechanism. > > 8. Report expedited grace periods at context-switch time. This is > an optimization enabled by the RCU flavor consolidation. > > 9. Define RCU-bh update API in terms of RCU. This commit gets rid > of the RCU-bh update mechanism. > > 10. Update comments and help text to account for the removal of > the RCU-bh update mechanism. > > 11. Drop "wake" parameter from rcu_report_exp_rdp(). > > 12. Fix typo in rcu_get_gp_kthreads_prio() header comment. > > 13. Define RCU-sched API in terms of RCU for Tree RCU PREEMPT builds. > Although this commit gets rid of the RCU-sched update mechanism > from PREEMPT builds, it of course remains as the sole RCU flavor > for !PREEMPT && !SMP builds. > > 14. Express Tiny RCU updates in terms of RCU rather than RCU-sched. > This will enable additional cleanups and code savings. > > 15. Remove RCU_STATE_INITIALIZER() in favor of just using an open-coded > initializer for the sole remaining rcu_state structure. > > 16. Eliminate rcu_state structure's ->call field, as it is now always > just call_rcu(). > > 17. Remove rcu_state structure's ->rda field, as there is now only one > set of per-CPU rcu_data structures. And last, but perhaps not least: 18. Remove rcu_state_p pointer to default rcu_state structure, now that there is only one rcu_state structure. 19. Remove rcu_data_p pointer to default rcu_data structure, now that there is only one set of per-CPU rcu_data structures. Thanx, Paul > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Documentation/RCU/Design/Requirements/Requirements.html | 50 - > include/linux/rcupdate.h | 48 - > include/linux/rcupdate_wait.h | 6 > include/linux/rcutiny.h | 61 + > include/linux/rcutree.h | 31 > include/linux/sched.h | 6 > kernel/rcu/Kconfig | 10 > kernel/rcu/rcutorture.c | 1 > kernel/rcu/tiny.c | 163 +-- > kernel/rcu/tree.c | 655 +++++----------- > kernel/rcu/tree.h | 44 - > kernel/rcu/tree_exp.h | 256 +++--- > kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h | 523 ++++++------ > kernel/rcu/update.c | 2 > kernel/softirq.c | 3 > 15 files changed, 836 insertions(+), 1023 deletions(-)