Received: by 2002:ac0:a5a6:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id m35-v6csp117469imm; Wed, 29 Aug 2018 15:41:48 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ANB0VdZQoLofST5Os5A5Uai/sVmDjyU+1Nbi1gCuhuGCUAKBGZriKu92yly0LvA0q0Jt8Bp0v/6J X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:b784:: with SMTP id e4-v6mr7715831pls.204.1535582508937; Wed, 29 Aug 2018 15:41:48 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1535582508; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=mk/NNvohcujFOekiHKQZd4OyIznHq/+r2eOcDpbATTyUxydXfR7RKutvCxSFJ1Z1I7 e247IjDu6Lp8mIVmn3g2j7QNtg/WMkui7pOK41pngS4fYI6NHEPd0cRHCumt/wh6MpU4 7vHJucECP7SFQsZhe2TdGC8cAneIPoMgZFhiM6//ALH51dpo2AEX/opD8rEbF0YCBBEL JfMJxDsZz2yo+GVd0Hm+QOjx7p5WCJEZoeU+sZVG9AHTJV6USzTOAZQiFntaNDEDwof2 9Jo29keOi4EHhf1Lu6HDJNQj3CsJNd1RQFG+MQbnTqMIXDDNTmO+UR3q+XuDz6ebU2+C n53A== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:message-id:references:in-reply-to:date :subject:cc:to:from:arc-authentication-results; bh=bo9gI9O+QraHxsy6+sBuvgOBfUTMpT1WVJg/XybQANU=; b=Yud5y/kEocj1b/8cVeBkXnI0YRgKOdM0tXRe/YuCL0kySJs0sSb8mW9aEiNTjT7Mwj YGNVB3Lv62KXpnsaagh2q2CCIGs2qvmf7HDFz1MU4/babEWpB6TRRBHiV4Yzbemi+gwM DYae4zS5UCgZNbmaKiSOLbCvdvAgeaLEoiEKAFEz8NqVW5Vm189nX+c0Jt3MXX+L2e2v Bnw3KEM1actr2zlCPPPXuCKR+cTCFsvn0hMlilccOiyA7i1s+Gh/lmhD2A2f0DU72YBj kEdc0l7y1IL9HduhB95Ccne0ewKr9GjWbY2HdCReXGxGMtRypoBHQIOM59BGTRodjRi3 2zhg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ibm.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id b31-v6si4618104pgl.437.2018.08.29.15.41.34; Wed, 29 Aug 2018 15:41:48 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ibm.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727804AbeH3CiJ (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 29 Aug 2018 22:38:09 -0400 Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.156.1]:49320 "EHLO mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727480AbeH3CiH (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 Aug 2018 22:38:07 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098404.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.22/8.16.0.22) with SMTP id w7TMcjg8093149 for ; Wed, 29 Aug 2018 18:39:04 -0400 Received: from e15.ny.us.ibm.com (e15.ny.us.ibm.com [129.33.205.205]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2m64a288mb-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Wed, 29 Aug 2018 18:39:03 -0400 Received: from localhost by e15.ny.us.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Wed, 29 Aug 2018 18:39:02 -0400 Received: from b01cxnp23032.gho.pok.ibm.com (9.57.198.27) by e15.ny.us.ibm.com (146.89.104.202) with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted; (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256/256) Wed, 29 Aug 2018 18:38:58 -0400 Received: from b01ledav003.gho.pok.ibm.com (b01ledav003.gho.pok.ibm.com [9.57.199.108]) by b01cxnp23032.gho.pok.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id w7TMcvuV28049586 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Wed, 29 Aug 2018 22:38:57 GMT Received: from b01ledav003.gho.pok.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21198B2075; Wed, 29 Aug 2018 18:37:53 -0400 (EDT) Received: from b01ledav003.gho.pok.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D10CB2070; Wed, 29 Aug 2018 18:37:53 -0400 (EDT) Received: from paulmck-ThinkPad-W541 (unknown [9.70.82.159]) by b01ledav003.gho.pok.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Wed, 29 Aug 2018 18:37:53 -0400 (EDT) Received: by paulmck-ThinkPad-W541 (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 5DF9F16C025C; Wed, 29 Aug 2018 15:38:56 -0700 (PDT) From: "Paul E. McKenney" To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: mingo@kernel.org, jiangshanlai@gmail.com, dipankar@in.ibm.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com, josh@joshtriplett.org, tglx@linutronix.de, peterz@infradead.org, rostedt@goodmis.org, dhowells@redhat.com, edumazet@google.com, fweisbec@gmail.com, oleg@redhat.com, joel@joelfernandes.org, "Paul E. McKenney" Subject: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 30/52] rcu: Remove rsp parameter from __rcu_pending() Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2018 15:38:32 -0700 X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.17.1 In-Reply-To: <20180829223830.GA1800@linux.vnet.ibm.com> References: <20180829223830.GA1800@linux.vnet.ibm.com> X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 x-cbid: 18082922-0068-0000-0000-00000331B954 X-IBM-SpamModules-Scores: X-IBM-SpamModules-Versions: BY=3.00009636; HX=3.00000242; KW=3.00000007; PH=3.00000004; SC=3.00000266; SDB=6.01080744; UDB=6.00557497; IPR=6.00860730; MB=3.00023002; MTD=3.00000008; XFM=3.00000015; UTC=2018-08-29 22:39:01 X-IBM-AV-DETECTION: SAVI=unused REMOTE=unused XFE=unused x-cbparentid: 18082922-0069-0000-0000-0000458F1616 Message-Id: <20180829223854.4055-30-paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:,, definitions=2018-08-29_06:,, signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=1 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1015 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1807170000 definitions=main-1808290220 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org There now is only one rcu_state structure in a given build of the Linux kernel, so there is no need to pass it as a parameter to RCU's functions. This commit therefore removes the rsp parameter from __rcu_pending(), and also inlines it into rcu_pending(), removing the for_each_rcu_flavor() while in the neighborhood.. Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney --- kernel/rcu/tree.c | 34 ++++++++++------------------------ 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-) diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.c b/kernel/rcu/tree.c index 4af227e826a6..e347a6b2984c 100644 --- a/kernel/rcu/tree.c +++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.c @@ -2996,8 +2996,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(call_rcu_sched); * callbacks in the list of pending callbacks. Until then, this * function may only be called from __kfree_rcu(). */ -void kfree_call_rcu(struct rcu_head *head, - rcu_callback_t func) +void kfree_call_rcu(struct rcu_head *head, rcu_callback_t func) { __call_rcu(head, func, -1, 1); } @@ -3079,21 +3078,23 @@ void cond_synchronize_sched(unsigned long oldstate) EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(cond_synchronize_sched); /* - * Check to see if there is any immediate RCU-related work to be done - * by the current CPU, for the specified type of RCU, returning 1 if so. - * The checks are in order of increasing expense: checks that can be - * carried out against CPU-local state are performed first. However, - * we must check for CPU stalls first, else we might not get a chance. + * Check to see if there is any immediate RCU-related work to be done by + * the current CPU, for the specified type of RCU, returning 1 if so and + * zero otherwise. The checks are in order of increasing expense: checks + * that can be carried out against CPU-local state are performed first. + * However, we must check for CPU stalls first, else we might not get + * a chance. */ -static int __rcu_pending(struct rcu_state *rsp, struct rcu_data *rdp) +static int rcu_pending(void) { + struct rcu_data *rdp = this_cpu_ptr(&rcu_data); struct rcu_node *rnp = rdp->mynode; /* Check for CPU stalls, if enabled. */ check_cpu_stall(rdp); /* Is this CPU a NO_HZ_FULL CPU that should ignore RCU? */ - if (rcu_nohz_full_cpu(rsp)) + if (rcu_nohz_full_cpu(&rcu_state)) return 0; /* Is the RCU core waiting for a quiescent state from this CPU? */ @@ -3123,21 +3124,6 @@ static int __rcu_pending(struct rcu_state *rsp, struct rcu_data *rdp) return 0; } -/* - * Check to see if there is any immediate RCU-related work to be done - * by the current CPU, returning 1 if so. This function is part of the - * RCU implementation; it is -not- an exported member of the RCU API. - */ -static int rcu_pending(void) -{ - struct rcu_state *rsp; - - for_each_rcu_flavor(rsp) - if (__rcu_pending(rsp, this_cpu_ptr(&rcu_data))) - return 1; - return 0; -} - /* * Return true if the specified CPU has any callback. If all_lazy is * non-NULL, store an indication of whether all callbacks are lazy. -- 2.17.1