Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
From:   "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:     linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc:     mingo@kernel.org, jiangshanlai@gmail.com, dipankar@in.ibm.com,
        akpm@linux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com,
        josh@joshtriplett.org, tglx@linutronix.de, peterz@infradead.org,
        rostedt@goodmis.org, dhowells@redhat.com, edumazet@google.com,
        fweisbec@gmail.com, oleg@redhat.com, joel@joelfernandes.org,
        "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 01/52] rcu: Remove rsp parameter from rcu_report_qs_rnp()
Date:   Wed, 29 Aug 2018 15:38:03 -0700
In-Reply-To: <20180829223830.GA1800@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
References: <20180829223830.GA1800@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Message-Id: <20180829223854.4055-1-paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

There now is only one rcu_state structure in a given build of the
Linux kernel, so there is no need to pass it as a parameter to RCU's
functions.  This commit therefore removes the rsp parameter from
rcu_report_qs_rnp().

Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
 kernel/rcu/tree.c | 23 +++++++++++------------
 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.c b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
index f0e7e3972fd9..c9f4d7f3de91 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree.c
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
@@ -132,9 +132,8 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(rcu_scheduler_active);
  */
 static int rcu_scheduler_fully_active __read_mostly;
 
-static void
-rcu_report_qs_rnp(unsigned long mask, struct rcu_state *rsp,
-		  struct rcu_node *rnp, unsigned long gps, unsigned long flags);
+static void rcu_report_qs_rnp(unsigned long mask, struct rcu_node *rnp,
+			      unsigned long gps, unsigned long flags);
 static void rcu_init_new_rnp(struct rcu_node *rnp_leaf);
 static void rcu_cleanup_dead_rnp(struct rcu_node *rnp_leaf);
 static void rcu_boost_kthread_setaffinity(struct rcu_node *rnp, int outgoingcpu);
@@ -1946,7 +1945,7 @@ static bool rcu_gp_init(struct rcu_state *rsp)
 		mask = rnp->qsmask & ~rnp->qsmaskinitnext;
 		rnp->rcu_gp_init_mask = mask;
 		if ((mask || rnp->wait_blkd_tasks) && rcu_is_leaf_node(rnp))
-			rcu_report_qs_rnp(mask, rsp, rnp, rnp->gp_seq, flags);
+			rcu_report_qs_rnp(mask, rnp, rnp->gp_seq, flags);
 		else
 			raw_spin_unlock_irq_rcu_node(rnp);
 		cond_resched_tasks_rcu_qs();
@@ -2213,13 +2212,13 @@ static void rcu_report_qs_rsp(struct rcu_state *rsp, unsigned long flags)
  * disabled.  This allows propagating quiescent state due to resumed tasks
  * during grace-period initialization.
  */
-static void
-rcu_report_qs_rnp(unsigned long mask, struct rcu_state *rsp,
-		  struct rcu_node *rnp, unsigned long gps, unsigned long flags)
+static void rcu_report_qs_rnp(unsigned long mask, struct rcu_node *rnp,
+			      unsigned long gps, unsigned long flags)
 	__releases(rnp->lock)
 {
 	unsigned long oldmask = 0;
 	struct rcu_node *rnp_c;
+	struct rcu_state __maybe_unused *rsp = &rcu_state;
 
 	raw_lockdep_assert_held_rcu_node(rnp);
 
@@ -2311,7 +2310,7 @@ rcu_report_unblock_qs_rnp(struct rcu_state *rsp,
 	mask = rnp->grpmask;
 	raw_spin_unlock_rcu_node(rnp);	/* irqs remain disabled. */
 	raw_spin_lock_rcu_node(rnp_p);	/* irqs already disabled. */
-	rcu_report_qs_rnp(mask, rsp, rnp_p, gps, flags);
+	rcu_report_qs_rnp(mask, rnp_p, gps, flags);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -2354,7 +2353,7 @@ rcu_report_qs_rdp(int cpu, struct rcu_state *rsp, struct rcu_data *rdp)
 		 */
 		needwake = rcu_accelerate_cbs(rsp, rnp, rdp);
 
-		rcu_report_qs_rnp(mask, rsp, rnp, rnp->gp_seq, flags);
+		rcu_report_qs_rnp(mask, rnp, rnp->gp_seq, flags);
 		/* ^^^ Released rnp->lock */
 		if (needwake)
 			rcu_gp_kthread_wake(rsp);
@@ -2622,7 +2621,7 @@ static void force_qs_rnp(struct rcu_state *rsp, int (*f)(struct rcu_data *rsp))
 		}
 		if (mask != 0) {
 			/* Idle/offline CPUs, report (releases rnp->lock). */
-			rcu_report_qs_rnp(mask, rsp, rnp, rnp->gp_seq, flags);
+			rcu_report_qs_rnp(mask, rnp, rnp->gp_seq, flags);
 		} else {
 			/* Nothing to do here, so just drop the lock. */
 			raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore_rcu_node(rnp, flags);
@@ -3576,7 +3575,7 @@ void rcu_cpu_starting(unsigned int cpu)
 		rdp->rcu_onl_gp_flags = READ_ONCE(rsp->gp_flags);
 		if (rnp->qsmask & mask) { /* RCU waiting on incoming CPU? */
 			/* Report QS -after- changing ->qsmaskinitnext! */
-			rcu_report_qs_rnp(mask, rsp, rnp, rnp->gp_seq, flags);
+			rcu_report_qs_rnp(mask, rnp, rnp->gp_seq, flags);
 		} else {
 			raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore_rcu_node(rnp, flags);
 		}
@@ -3605,7 +3604,7 @@ static void rcu_cleanup_dying_idle_cpu(int cpu, struct rcu_state *rsp)
 	rdp->rcu_ofl_gp_flags = READ_ONCE(rsp->gp_flags);
 	if (rnp->qsmask & mask) { /* RCU waiting on outgoing CPU? */
 		/* Report quiescent state -before- changing ->qsmaskinitnext! */
-		rcu_report_qs_rnp(mask, rsp, rnp, rnp->gp_seq, flags);
+		rcu_report_qs_rnp(mask, rnp, rnp->gp_seq, flags);
 		raw_spin_lock_irqsave_rcu_node(rnp, flags);
 	}
 	rnp->qsmaskinitnext &= ~mask;
-- 
2.17.1