Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Thu, 30 Aug 2018 16:20:04 +0300
From:   Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>
To:     Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc:     "Ahmed S. Darwish" <darwish.07@gmail.com>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/13] proc: readdir /proc/*/task
Message-ID: <20180830132004.GB31422@avx2>
References: <20180827231503.26899-1-adobriyan@gmail.com>
 <20180827231503.26899-11-adobriyan@gmail.com>
 <20180828123622.GA2087@darwi-kernel>
 <20180828130440.GA6464@darwi-kernel>
 <20180828193502.GB4847@avx2>
 <20180829164330.435fb1d1c78e9d066e5eb862@linux-foundation.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20180829164330.435fb1d1c78e9d066e5eb862@linux-foundation.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, Aug 29, 2018 at 04:43:30PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Tue, 28 Aug 2018 22:35:02 +0300 Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> > > Are we really in a super hot path to justify all that?
> > 
> > /proc is very slow, try profiling just about anything involving /proc.
> 
> So how much does this patchset help?  Some timing measurements would
> really help things along, if they show goodness.

Benchmarking results are in individual patches. They are ~1-7-20%
better overall. However those are microbenchmarks.