Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Thu, 30 Aug 2018 07:38:53 -0700
From:   Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To:     Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@sifive.com>
Cc:     linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, daniel.lezcano@linaro.org,
        jason@lakedaemon.net, ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org,
        marc.zyngier@arm.com, catalin.marinas@arm.com,
        dmitriy@oss-tech.org, jeremy.linton@arm.com,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, atish.patra@wdc.com,
        aou@eecs.berkeley.edu, Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        tglx@linutronix.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/8] RISC-V: Don't set
 cacheinfo.{physical_line_partition, attributes}
Message-ID: <20180830143853.GD11544@infradead.org>
References: <20180827184243.25344-1-palmer@sifive.com>
 <20180827184243.25344-3-palmer@sifive.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20180827184243.25344-3-palmer@sifive.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.2 (2017-12-15)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, Aug 27, 2018 at 11:42:37AM -0700, Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
> These are just hard coded in the RISC-V port, which doesn't make any
> sense.  We should probably be setting these from device tree entries
> when they exist, but for now I think it's saner to just leave them all
> as their default values.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@sifive.com>

Looks fine:

Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>