Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Thu, 30 Aug 2018 13:40:12 -0400
From:   Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
To:     "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@kernel.org,
        jiangshanlai@gmail.com, dipankar@in.ibm.com,
        akpm@linux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com,
        josh@joshtriplett.org, tglx@linutronix.de, peterz@infradead.org,
        dhowells@redhat.com, edumazet@google.com, fweisbec@gmail.com,
        oleg@redhat.com, joel@joelfernandes.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 0/52] Remove rcu_state pointers for
 v4.20/v5.0
Message-ID: <20180830134012.7efc3cce@gandalf.local.home>
In-Reply-To: <20180830171006.GK4225@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
References: <20180829223830.GA1800@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
        <20180829220026.3579e9a1@vmware.local.home>
        <20180830032216.GF4225@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
        <20180830041017.GA27378@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
        <20180830114452.309e104f@gandalf.local.home>
        <20180830171006.GK4225@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Thu, 30 Aug 2018 10:10:06 -0700
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:


> > I would just keep the documentation patches separate.  
> 
> Combining yours and Josh's feedback, I will split the documentation
> updates out of 4ca0508f7870 ("rcu: Remove rsp parameter from rcu_node tree
> accessor macros") and put them into the "doc" series.  Possibly combining
> it with 2ea66b6fce61 ("doc: Update documentation for removal of RCU-bh
> update machinery") and/or 3f38a4626202 ("doc: Update documentation for
> removal of RCU-sched update machinery").  Left to myself, I would merge
> it in to the merger of those two documentation commits.  Having them
> together is probably more convenient anyway, as it would provide a
> summary of the entire RCU-flavor-consolidation change.
> 
> Fair enough?
>

Go for it ;-)

-- Steve