Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] ARM: dts: socfpga: Add support for PMU on
 Arria5/Cyclone5
To:     Dinh Nguyen <dinguyen@kernel.org>,
        Florian Vaussard <florian.vaussard@gmail.com>
Cc:     Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
        Alberto Dassatti <alberto.dassatti@heig-vd.ch>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        Florian Vaussard <florian.vaussard@heig-vd.ch>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
        linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
References: <1488297132-21553-1-git-send-email-florian.vaussard@heig-vd.ch>
 <d723d5df-a700-3781-e8a5-4e57185585f8@kernel.org>
From:   Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <b575b848-ffaa-43cd-ee70-8538ede3eca8@gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 31 Aug 2018 05:06:57 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/52.8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <d723d5df-a700-3781-e8a5-4e57185585f8@kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On 03/08/2017 04:19 PM, Dinh Nguyen wrote:
> 
> 
> On 02/28/2017 09:52 AM, Florian Vaussard wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> These patches add suport for ARM Performance Monitor Units on Arria5 and
>> Cyclone5 SoCFPGA. This was tested on a Cyclone 5 SoC DK board.
>>
>> Side note: the same change can be probably applied to Arria10 as well,
>> but we do not have the hardware here to test.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Florian
>>
>> Florian Vaussard (2):
>>   ARM: dts: socfpga: Add labels for CPU nodes
>>   ARM: dts: socfpga: Add support for PMU
>>
>>  arch/arm/boot/dts/socfpga.dtsi | 13 +++++++++++--
>>  1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
> 
> Applied!

I have to wonder how this was tested. I tried this on 4.14.y, but when I
do "perf record -e cycles", I get no samples. Moreover, when I check the
PMU interrupts, "grep pmu /proc/interrupts", it shows 0 interrupts from
the ARM PMU all the time.

Why am I not getting any PMU interrupts when using perf ?

-- 
Best regards,
Marek Vasut