Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Thu, 30 Aug 2018 22:54:47 -0700
From:   Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To:     Atish Patra <atish.patra@wdc.com>
Cc:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
        Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@sifive.com>,
        "linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org" <linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org>,
        "daniel.lezcano@linaro.org" <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>,
        "jason@lakedaemon.net" <jason@lakedaemon.net>,
        "ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org" <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>,
        "marc.zyngier@arm.com" <marc.zyngier@arm.com>,
        "catalin.marinas@arm.com" <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
        "dmitriy@oss-tech.org" <dmitriy@oss-tech.org>,
        "jeremy.linton@arm.com" <jeremy.linton@arm.com>,
        "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        "aou@eecs.berkeley.edu" <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>,
        Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        "tglx@linutronix.de" <tglx@linutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/8] RISC-V: Rename im_okay_therefore_i_am to
 found_boot_cpu
Message-ID: <20180831055447.GA18478@infradead.org>
References: <20180827184243.25344-1-palmer@sifive.com>
 <20180827184243.25344-6-palmer@sifive.com>
 <20180830144118.GA27233@infradead.org>
 <30229ef5-ce4e-e78b-32f9-7c563f63827b@wdc.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <30229ef5-ce4e-e78b-32f9-7c563f63827b@wdc.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.2 (2017-12-15)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Thu, Aug 30, 2018 at 09:11:11AM -0700, Atish Patra wrote:
> On 8/30/18 7:41 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > >   	struct device_node *dn = NULL;
> > > -	int hart, im_okay_therefore_i_am = 0;
> > > +	int hart, found_boot_cpu = 0;
> > 
> > If you rename this anyway please switch to use a bool.
> > 
> 
> I can address the comment on this patch and fold it in my series to avoid
> unnecessary conflict.
> 
> @Palmer: You can drop this patch.

If Palmer is ok with it how about you include a respin of his whole
series?  There are some overlaps I think and having a single person
in charge might be helpful.

Btw, I've found your series in my linux-kernel folder, but it did
not make it to linux-riscv or my personal inbox despite the CC.