Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 smtp.codeaurora.org C1032606FC
From:   Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
To:     Igor Stoppa <igor.stoppa@gmail.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Igor Stoppa <igor.stoppa@huawei.com>,
        Christian Lamparter <chunkeey@googlemail.com>,
        linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/23] wireless: remove unnecessary unlikely()
References: <20180830223429.30051-1-igor.stoppa@huawei.com>
        <20180830223429.30051-11-igor.stoppa@huawei.com>
Date:   Fri, 31 Aug 2018 12:52:33 +0300
In-Reply-To: <20180830223429.30051-11-igor.stoppa@huawei.com> (Igor Stoppa's
        message of "Fri, 31 Aug 2018 01:34:16 +0300")
Message-ID: <87va7qdfry.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

+ linux-wireless

Igor Stoppa <igor.stoppa@gmail.com> writes:

> WARN_ON_ONCE() already contains an unlikely(), and the logical or of two of
> them is still unlikely(), so it's not necessary to wrap them into another.
>
> Signed-off-by: Igor Stoppa <igor.stoppa@huawei.com>
> Cc: Christian Lamparter <chunkeey@googlemail.com>
> Cc: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>

IMHO you could fold patches 10, 11 and 12 into one to avoid having three
patches with duplicate titles. Or alternatively use proper driver
prefixes like "ath10k:", "b43:" and so on.

But how do you want these to be applied? For the wireless patches you
didn't Cc linux-wireless so our patchwork won't see them and hence I
can't take them. So if you want me to take these, please resend and
include linux-wireless.

-- 
Kalle Valo