Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Fri, 31 Aug 2018 12:13:15 +0200
From:   Johan Hovold <johan@kernel.org>
To:     "Ji-Ze Hong (Peter Hong)" <hpeter@gmail.com>
Cc:     johan@kernel.org, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org,
        linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        peter_hong@fintek.com.tw, hpeter+linux_kernel@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 3/4] serial: f81232: implement break control
Message-ID: <20180831101315.GM28861@localhost>
References: <1535593634-22004-1-git-send-email-hpeter+linux_kernel@gmail.com>
 <1535593634-22004-4-git-send-email-hpeter+linux_kernel@gmail.com>
 <3f4bc3ff-1e72-54ee-1047-c69a0ff45771@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <3f4bc3ff-1e72-54ee-1047-c69a0ff45771@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Thu, Aug 30, 2018 at 09:55:46AM +0800, Ji-Ze Hong (Peter Hong) wrote:
> Hi Johan,
> 
> This article is duplication with
> [PATCH V2 3/4] USB: serial: f81232: implement break control
> [PATCH V2 3/4] serial: f81232: implement break control
> 	(Title not start with USB token)
> 
> Should I discard this PATCH_V2 series and re-send PATCH_V3 ?
> or could you discard the patch - serial: f81232: implement break control
> only ?

Yes, no problem, so no need to resend. But thanks for highlighting this.

I'll try to look at these next week.

Johan