Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
From:   "Andrew F. Davis" <afd@ti.com>
To:     Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com>, Kevin Hilman <khilman@kernel.org>,
        Keerthy <j-keerthy@ti.com>,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
CC:     <linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        "Andrew F . Davis" <afd@ti.com>
Subject: [PATCH 3/5] gpio: davinci: Allocate the correct amount of memory for controller
Date:   Fri, 31 Aug 2018 14:13:24 -0500
Message-ID: <20180831191326.25106-3-afd@ti.com>
In-Reply-To: <20180831191326.25106-1-afd@ti.com>
References: <20180831191326.25106-1-afd@ti.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

Previously we created a controller structure per bank of GPIO pins. This
has since been changed to one per controller, but the allocation size
was not changed. Fix this here.

This also leaves the variable 'nbank' unused, instead of removing it,
move it down and use it to clean up a loop. For loops with multiple
initializers and/or iteration expressions, especially ones that don't
use those loop counters are quite hard to follow, fix this.

Signed-off-by: Andrew F. Davis <afd@ti.com>
---
 drivers/gpio/gpio-davinci.c | 10 ++++------
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-davinci.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-davinci.c
index 14d1729927d3..121a7948f785 100644
--- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-davinci.c
+++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-davinci.c
@@ -165,7 +165,7 @@ davinci_gpio_get_pdata(struct platform_device *pdev)
 
 static int davinci_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 {
-	int gpio, bank, i, ret = 0;
+	int bank, i, ret = 0;
 	unsigned int ngpio, nbank, nirq;
 	struct davinci_gpio_controller *chips;
 	struct davinci_gpio_platform_data *pdata;
@@ -204,10 +204,7 @@ static int davinci_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	else
 		nirq = DIV_ROUND_UP(ngpio, 16);
 
-	nbank = DIV_ROUND_UP(ngpio, 32);
-	chips = devm_kcalloc(dev,
-			     nbank, sizeof(struct davinci_gpio_controller),
-			     GFP_KERNEL);
+	chips = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*chips), GFP_KERNEL);
 	if (!chips)
 		return -ENOMEM;
 
@@ -247,7 +244,8 @@ static int davinci_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 #endif
 	spin_lock_init(&chips->lock);
 
-	for (gpio = 0, bank = 0; gpio < ngpio; gpio += 32, bank++)
+	nbank = DIV_ROUND_UP(ngpio, 32);
+	for (bank = 0; bank < nbank; bank++)
 		chips->regs[bank] = gpio_base + offset_array[bank];
 
 	ret = devm_gpiochip_add_data(dev, &chips->chip, chips);
-- 
2.18.0