Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S263009AbTKER5w (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 Nov 2003 12:57:52 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S263019AbTKER5w (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 Nov 2003 12:57:52 -0500 Received: from perninha.conectiva.com.br ([200.140.247.100]:60098 "EHLO perninha.conectiva.com.br") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S263009AbTKER5v (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 Nov 2003 12:57:51 -0500 Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2003 15:57:48 -0200 From: Flavio Bruno Leitner To: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: IDE disk information changed from 2.4 to 2.6 Message-ID: <20031105175748.GF5304@conectiva.com.br> References: <20031105172310.GE5304@conectiva.com.br> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 991 Lines: 32 On Wed, Nov 05, 2003 at 06:29:07PM +0100, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote: > > > On Wed, 5 Nov 2003, Flavio Bruno Leitner wrote: > > > Upgrading from kernel 2.4 to 2.6 the CHS information for the same hardware > > What are the exact kernel versions? All versions up to 2.4.20 report the same information and 2.6 is one snapshot from Linus bk 2003-10-29. I tested on another machine which the same chipset (but more recent bk snapshot) and the behaviour is ok. I'm updating the kernel on the machine that reproduces this bug to see if happens again. > > changed. This behaviour is correct? > > I am just investigating it. Thanks! -- Fl?vio Bruno Leitner [ E74B 0BD0 5E05 C385 239E 531C BC17 D670 7FF0 A9E0 ] - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/