Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Mon, 3 Sep 2018 15:45:22 +0200
From:   Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
To:     Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
Cc:     Quentin Schulz <quentin.schulz@bootlin.com>, ralf@linux-mips.org,
        paul.burton@mips.com, jhogan@kernel.org, robh+dt@kernel.org,
        mark.rutland@arm.com, davem@davemloft.net, kishon@ti.com,
        f.fainelli@gmail.com, allan.nielsen@microchip.com,
        linux-mips@linux-mips.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
        thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/11] mscc: ocelot: add support for SerDes muxing
 configuration
Message-ID: <20180903134522.GC13888@piout.net>
References: <20180903093308.24366-1-quentin.schulz@bootlin.com>
 <20180903133415.GF4445@lunn.ch>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20180903133415.GF4445@lunn.ch>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On 03/09/2018 15:34:15+0200, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> > I suggest patches 1 and 8 go through MIPS tree, 2 to 5 and 11 go through
> > net while the others (6, 7, 9 and 10) go through the generic PHY subsystem.
> 
> Hi Quentin
> 
> Are you expecting merge conflicts? If not, it might be simpler to gets
> ACKs from each maintainer, and then merge it though one tree.
> 

There are some other DT changes for this cycle so those should probably
go through MIPS.

-- 
Alexandre Belloni, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com