Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S263592AbTKFNtV (ORCPT ); Thu, 6 Nov 2003 08:49:21 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S263606AbTKFNtV (ORCPT ); Thu, 6 Nov 2003 08:49:21 -0500 Received: from mail-05.iinet.net.au ([203.59.3.37]:64167 "HELO mail.iinet.net.au") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S263592AbTKFNtA (ORCPT ); Thu, 6 Nov 2003 08:49:00 -0500 Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2003 21:46:41 +0800 (WST) From: Ian Kent To: Mike Waychison cc: Kernel Mailing List , Tim Hockin Subject: Your increase minor device patch Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 823 Lines: 24 It's me again, back on the minor device number enlargement patch. Your patch looks good. It's simple enough to verify correctness. With all the work that has been done already on the minor device number enlargment in 2.6 it seems a shame that this final piece is not yet in the kernel tree. Shouldn't this be submitted to Linux with a justification like the above? What do you guys think about the chances of getting it accepted? -- ,-._|\ Ian Kent / \ Perth, Western Australia *_.--._/ E-mail: raven@themaw.net v Web: http://themaw.net/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/