Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Mon, 3 Sep 2018 17:17:59 +0300
From:   Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>
To:     joe@perches.com
Cc:     linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/13] seq_file: rewrite seq_puts() in terms of
 seq_write()
Message-ID: <20180903141759.GA11586@avx2>
References: <20180827231503.26899-1-adobriyan@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20180827231503.26899-1-adobriyan@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

Joe Perches wrote:

> > If execution speed is really an issue, as
> > almost all of the uses are for const strings,
> > why not use a #define and avoid the runtime
> > cost of strlen where possible.
> 
> fyi: an x86-64 defconfig increases < .5 kb and
> presumably is faster for most all seq_puts uses

> -void seq_puts(struct seq_file *m, const char *s);
> +#define seq_puts(m, s) seq_write(m, s, strlen(s))

I don't know, seq_puts() patch was last minute observation.
It is independent of _print_integer() stuff.

Your version should be "static inline" of course.