Received: by 2002:ac0:a5a6:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id m35-v6csp1792894imm; Mon, 3 Sep 2018 09:33:04 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ANB0VdZQpfP1/Vl+nSJlbbsgWchfRv6WTXv+SO6xCCingqvfz5tpFEGbBWq6PJeL69RiV9s6tl/D X-Received: by 2002:a63:7f55:: with SMTP id p21-v6mr5089625pgn.285.1535992384349; Mon, 03 Sep 2018 09:33:04 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1535992384; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=gVgU1GMTeup/Q+G986tNQJ9kk7ZIxKe0d2/zPafoxmIzJ8AXJ4XJU4CkxHDrlR96Dg Isg4sgFCwOg3vqAmuh4U1zbmh7gjURbhkVPb7dCdeOdquFaGpD+gUPIiaS7yGd9XE3xN uAoNxkJ2xGucfXbeO0rmTWaKaX4SxnbNsGw0bJF9GejRI3iUfl5JtFZcnD9BkVzKc68S cxdmzRIH0lg9WFzgZX8U1o/GeMGe2B5v/mhLHVvwtfLoJYIYFliLlv9z44GBWhLKQcmD 69SVumH/KK1EFa80FNhsfTbvPoXkMAaDdOknwmiRzly4OJS5mGAvzmRklwh8P8SBCpiK vn/A== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:from:date:arc-authentication-results; bh=ibyMO9AcTKyxLHW27qTeG5TaqKBfz0oxHtZaPgy6WSM=; b=JZB0SsD9XzvkUhrkwbCDCFpIxIu+i9FXLnFkjqA9rRX++c73KBIVellwPPqGVO2M1G JfFqOgijLzwah09n/qYkWvEOjyb+7vuDc8EYIYpsiNZrq5w9SQNBOhm8eKZCanU81yzr hhT3AVs9SwIQ5oNsajfaE7JiUPPfwwJdnywP7onFkl3HrDZrsUXOM4WZDarva/l3M1LZ cf0Ctvbz6miambwYPJkk4/NRjfVKg+/k7X4uaqkHSnxAR57GxnPsBlxC1CTRQnC6bjV8 m7DY7Gn4onWw8oNnedrIk37Y5TVENjCQxtpJMp8OWcxVPqe6VfYCEJSwxjZccUwZtX6J PgwA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id j23-v6si18051933pgn.139.2018.09.03.09.32.48; Mon, 03 Sep 2018 09:33:04 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727616AbeICUv7 (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 3 Sep 2018 16:51:59 -0400 Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:33804 "EHLO mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727447AbeICUv7 (ORCPT ); Mon, 3 Sep 2018 16:51:59 -0400 Received: from localhost (ip-213-127-74-90.ip.prioritytelecom.net [213.127.74.90]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D1DC4CE9; Mon, 3 Sep 2018 16:31:06 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2018 18:31:04 +0200 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: Daniel Rosenberg Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@android.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: android: ion: check for kref overflow Message-ID: <20180903163104.GF6712@kroah.com> References: <20180830230946.228701-1-drosen@google.com> <20180831004144.GC20664@kroah.com> <589c036d-450a-3f3b-8f5a-4148713d4bfb@google.com> <20180831155657.GA25066@kroah.com> <4b4e64a4-bf6f-b3d0-4221-2a0d3206a6a9@google.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4b4e64a4-bf6f-b3d0-4221-2a0d3206a6a9@google.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Aug 31, 2018 at 02:31:38PM -0700, Daniel Rosenberg wrote: > > > On 08/31/2018 08:56 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > On Thu, Aug 30, 2018 at 06:36:18PM -0700, Daniel Rosenberg wrote: > > > The sign off was on the 4.4.y version that I cherry-picked this from. > > Ah that wasn't obvious at all. What is that git commit id? You need to > > give us a hint as to what is going on when you do that :) > b84ec04bae905901("staging: android: ion: check for kref overflow") in 4.4.y > > > There was a trivial conflict moving it to 4.9, but it did not modify > > > any changed lines, so I hadn't thought that was worth noting on the > > > patch. I apologise if leaving the signed-off-by was incorrect here. > > Why did I only apply this to 4.4 and not 4.9 when the original patch was > > submitted? That seems odd. > > > > thanks, > > > > greg k-h > I don't know. I had included it in the range of kernel versions it should be > applied to in the original patch, and noted the minor conflict for later > kernel versions. You added it in 3.18 and 4.4, and I assumed not 4.9 because > of the conflict in applying the patch, so I sent this version. > > b1fa6d8acb50c8e9 ("staging: android: ion: Pull out ion ioctls to a separate > file") is the patch that causes the minor conflict in applying the original > patch. > 4c23cbff073f3b9b ("staging: android: ion: Remove import interface") is the > patch that removes the affected code altogether in later kernels versions. Ok, that makes more sense, thanks for letting me know, this was an odd one-off and I didn't remember it at all. Now queued up. greg k-h