Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2003 09:43:48 -0500 (EST)
From: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
To: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
cc: bert hubert <ahu@ds9a.nl>, Scott Robert Ladd <coyote@coyotegulch.com>,
       Larry McVoy <lm@bitmover.com>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: BK2CVS problem
In-Reply-To: <20031106132212.GA23624@thunk.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0311060943110.14577-100000@chimarrao.boston.redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 718
Lines: 18

On Thu, 6 Nov 2003, Theodore Ts'o wrote:

> (For people who think this is somehow a BK vs. CVS unfairness, it's
> probably true --- remote's CVS's security properties are only best
> described as terrifying.

I've heard it described as "security through nausea"  ;)

-- 
"Debugging is twice as hard as writing the code in the first place.
Therefore, if you write the code as cleverly as possible, you are,
by definition, not smart enough to debug it." - Brian W. Kernighan

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/