Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S263717AbTKFQzs (ORCPT ); Thu, 6 Nov 2003 11:55:48 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S263718AbTKFQzs (ORCPT ); Thu, 6 Nov 2003 11:55:48 -0500 Received: from hockin.org ([66.35.79.110]:43269 "EHLO www.hockin.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S263717AbTKFQzn (ORCPT ); Thu, 6 Nov 2003 11:55:43 -0500 Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2003 08:46:14 -0800 From: Tim Hockin To: Ian Kent Cc: Mike Waychison , Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: Your increase minor device patch Message-ID: <20031106164614.GA21098@hockin.org> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1047 Lines: 25 On Thu, Nov 06, 2003 at 09:46:41PM +0800, Ian Kent wrote: > Your patch looks good. It's simple enough to verify correctness. With > all the work that has been done already on the minor device number > enlargment in 2.6 it seems a shame that this final piece is not yet > in the kernel tree. I'd like to seea sysctl controlled version, but with a bit of cleanup (or maube as is -- need to re-read it) it is 'safe' for 2.6.0. Linus may disagree, and we all have to admit that it is not 'stabilization' but a feature. No harm waiting for 2.6.1, though we should get it posted publicly as a pending patch. -- Notice that as computers are becoming easier and easier to use, suddenly there's a big market for "Dummies" books. Cause and effect, or merely an ironic juxtaposition of unrelated facts? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/