Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Tue, 4 Sep 2018 00:29:34 +0200
From:   Dominique Martinet <asmadeus@codewreck.org>
To:     "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Cc:     Eric Van Hensbergen <ericvh@gmail.com>,
        Latchesar Ionkov <lucho@ionkov.net>,
        v9fs-developer@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] 9p: fix spelling mistake in fall-through annotation
Message-ID: <20180903222934.GA25084@nautica>
References: <20180903193806.GA11258@embeddedor.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20180903193806.GA11258@embeddedor.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote on Mon, Sep 03, 2018:
> Replace "fallthough" with a proper "fall through" annotation.
> 
> This fix is part of the ongoing efforts to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough
> 
> Addresses-Coverity-ID: 402012 ("Missing break in switch")

I'm not a fan of these, as each coverity instance has their own ID, and
I have no idea if there is an "official" coverity for the linux
kernel -- is there?

(Well, I see many patches got landed with that, so I guess there would
be)

> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>

I'll take this, thanks.

-- 
Dominique