Received: by 2002:ac0:a5a6:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id m35-v6csp2114501imm; Mon, 3 Sep 2018 19:47:15 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ANB0VdYrsslMLwNJn5pBNgaVL+Q48cRST2ZhvINh8k+z7inZdTLCQdF8rCEXTCTDXG18EoPubV0D X-Received: by 2002:a63:352:: with SMTP id 79-v6mr28957202pgd.112.1536029235071; Mon, 03 Sep 2018 19:47:15 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1536029235; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=Hk+JTOB9xdWF3NGRnLAnhSc0OBuPBUYBlDMiFyXI269HfH3geOFBlwUyOdG8lW+ALf +YghyKf5jN9gPYthbbM13aBwxWPn5grnLEwkHAczTL5d29r+xjQFNp8TOxcTUyWOCzQd Vqf0Di9rgN97XzZSJp3OWTKnxaY3idKR/0AGTkDQzzuyTWRLavxw2BYAB87dm2F0/Gmr Uf2C7bwx80GZpb4InnJdn4zoOD6LM/b9EzhjXTymVtd7Zr8p6fipxb234SJ4MLBxgxjT 2VnD/57AeH0bRqmUCTv85F7XC+8lHZvge8aml/4p1QESov53F1rHZ/3vnVi4FJXQwtac Clhg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:from:date:arc-authentication-results; bh=cWS0sgvMkC7iMu8nj51MUFadwv786/MCGUkPRFSrE4c=; b=sHVYbAgRnUeRhXe389iFIYI0FrQbDd/hKtJEJ6CfRs4SOiy0QvMppQ9tJ2o4pdlXnm Akzq2GhmofpxdScmIG+kzwjsdPd3GXgDYxQGbKplvp4rQIpgFKaZqF353F9vL0sRLbIK xsd2MLxzL+Z/H1QRWN5L6ic2uKY1YwzrrvHpNUeKCWWulUZwKeZpZDvap3v31shdVYYo vQmJPBTmDABcI3F+xafSBr0OEwkCjbbUW6KI0+j2zSxUuzhSHmxMhwfZRE6EAn+qeKVI dqj4mjhioFeIN6QlKKZ5B2uugYplfE8ci8K/Zv7nSunOYV7havCZwehCgtnhoQmjFaKB NzHA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id bc5-v6si19585606plb.278.2018.09.03.19.46.59; Mon, 03 Sep 2018 19:47:15 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727509AbeIDHIf (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 4 Sep 2018 03:08:35 -0400 Received: from relay4-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.196]:58133 "EHLO relay4-d.mail.gandi.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727499AbeIDHIe (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Sep 2018 03:08:34 -0400 X-Originating-IP: 50.39.174.102 Received: from localhost (50-39-174-102.bvtn.or.frontiernet.net [50.39.174.102]) (Authenticated sender: josh@joshtriplett.org) by relay4-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id AFC09E0002; Tue, 4 Sep 2018 02:45:37 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2018 19:45:35 -0700 From: Josh Triplett To: Henrik Austad Cc: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] [RFC v2] Drop all 00-INDEX files from Documentation/ Message-ID: <20180904024534.GA29802@localhost> References: <1536012923-16275-1-git-send-email-henrik@austad.us> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1536012923-16275-1-git-send-email-henrik@austad.us> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org [Trimming to author, linux-doc, and LKML for response.] On Tue, Sep 04, 2018 at 12:15:23AM +0200, Henrik Austad wrote: > The 00-INDEX files are supposed to give a summary of all files present > in a directory, but these files are horribly out of date and their > usefulness is brought into question. Often a simple "ls" would reveal > the same information as the filenames are generally quite descriptive as > a short introduction to what the file covers (it should not surprise > anyone what Documentation/sched/sched-design-CFS.txt covers) > > A few years back it was mentioned that these files were no longer really > needed, and they have since then grown further out of date, so perhaps > it is time to just throw them out. [...] > As a starting point, remove all index-files and references to 00-INDEX and > see where the discussion is going. Yes please. I was *briefly* tempted, reading through the files, to suggest ensuring that the one-line descriptions from the 00-INDEX files end up in the documents themselves, but the more I think about it, I don't think even that is worth anyone's time to do. Reviewed-by: Josh Triplett