Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 23 Mar 2001 09:59:09 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 23 Mar 2001 09:59:00 -0500 Received: from perninha.conectiva.com.br ([200.250.58.156]:40463 "HELO postfix.conectiva.com.br") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Fri, 23 Mar 2001 09:58:45 -0500 Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2001 11:56:23 -0300 (BRST) From: Rik van Riel To: Martin Dalecki Cc: Stephen Clouse , Guest section DW , "Patrick O'Rourke" , linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Prevent OOM from killing init In-Reply-To: <3ABB2A19.D82B50A7@evision-ventures.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 23 Mar 2001, Martin Dalecki wrote: > Rik van Riel wrote: > > On Sat, 23 Mar 2002, Martin Dalecki wrote: > > > > > This is due to the broken calculation formula in oom_kill(). > > > > Feel free to write better-working code. > > I don't get paid for it and I'm not idling through my days... Well, in that case you'll have to live with the current OOM killer. Martin wrote down a pretty detailed description of what's wrong with my algorithm, if it really bothers him he should be able to come up with something better. Personally, I think there is more important VM code to look after, since OOM is a pretty rare occurrance anyway. regards, Rik -- Virtual memory is like a game you can't win; However, without VM there's truly nothing to lose... http://www.surriel.com/ http://www.conectiva.com/ http://distro.conectiva.com.br/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/