Received: by 2002:ac0:a5a6:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id m35-v6csp2731004imm; Tue, 4 Sep 2018 09:06:55 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ANB0Vdak5EVHevM+NNCcGF5WPP73LvBqeHwu70d5YNCjIkI1bKP4sAhWCZJAnC0PZTImOBhMTyr/ X-Received: by 2002:a63:c20:: with SMTP id b32-v6mr18789857pgl.400.1536077215863; Tue, 04 Sep 2018 09:06:55 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1536077215; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=BGzh8KUCMcGBn9p5zUFlycwVMvDpT1qt/vb36Rp4G+MPv2zwmYRiEVjFu5MOCHJnzR CrTQzalbiBuIQS+lAWIGZyGWZWSqesS1NO4zI9sf3eI5IeVaQg1L46B2y+5KDuIu2kA/ e36RolKc4lqBW+s2RgSxitOMlb9T0pQjF3Mnz4+U3FOxnSR/lglg6rzYGeZWs76IAj1l +CAENI+VG+kv9L03M2u7bAUZfm/f/fpSKEzjqwBBFSZXlW5lCXBFBvHRBQDk+941ff3L eXAhIIAphjPRMB4ruD7H0hV1/niotKquojX6vPMSPMB0b95ItsYWUaIHb/BS7MUzb40i mN5w== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:dkim-signature :arc-authentication-results; bh=uLU3lGxnz2rK+Q9Y8ng5fb8dv1R8pDi4V7PCZ74rhUo=; b=GADCNtU+ELFfBQTe1acefF7ubNbP0B3dRfUHOCBE12OLnNLvhjQ07mZSLTSwRj7gMe Bn1fxn8VKx5ym23ao57TYFJrYFw19G9foH+lfG1x/xVLalhbk9ALIADlc+KDXSYdGMV6 gGPO9NCik1HqK9yj8gnb/ZEnqngZ+NPbXIgFqYdMczov3lL+t0C0QBhCZQH3aAEJyx5t ya7BGH5MXpFFYjaeF7FdBX6chdg247W/9ZO1qg36ebzKReLO+lzjulY9Hw4ZzaGvJxP6 0HdeUaPlosbNjhMnySxHoVSVOhvUGH5GyZyjgbiu51p33lR9i7r6GseRu3qE+OxTjp85 ymKQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=Tb+qSzyx; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id b2-v6si20393420plx.121.2018.09.04.09.06.40; Tue, 04 Sep 2018 09:06:55 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=Tb+qSzyx; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727598AbeIDUbH (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 4 Sep 2018 16:31:07 -0400 Received: from mail-qk1-f194.google.com ([209.85.222.194]:42538 "EHLO mail-qk1-f194.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726015AbeIDUbH (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Sep 2018 16:31:07 -0400 Received: by mail-qk1-f194.google.com with SMTP id g13-v6so2757585qki.9; Tue, 04 Sep 2018 09:05:21 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=uLU3lGxnz2rK+Q9Y8ng5fb8dv1R8pDi4V7PCZ74rhUo=; b=Tb+qSzyxCB2x9KzxSjc9TcRaLKpIfjXwp9I8FWfqx8IEfmbsG7APJWPRFQYvQJxn+c VPKAe+K3aEDbjh45FnRYfXDjITLsGm0Q1NtGKRlhqCgTMamlR47igUoA8NCA2NcLdutt CG7ZytWjaK73hE0xe2RcrC0Q1CTzLJ3zIUt88HAGJaIlgHBMfYmGAA2e0DZo/tC92Z+K jggPuPJI5RV5C1CwggXCHFRB7GjzxSSlbuIX4fcAhd6SjEy9ccFfUnI4NMLYz6LaGGbv O7XhW/ZiQ/6P/sv0zk5kchtC1JPL3tvd9Mpd7HPLez0LBCnuG91akVN1gRyUOrppDkx5 BbkQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=uLU3lGxnz2rK+Q9Y8ng5fb8dv1R8pDi4V7PCZ74rhUo=; b=BegK6Mx2npQWtUvHgWhJVsEi0BP6yWMYers7zUaJxB5jD9iP9GyElOiPK9ht32Uokm QCNsgg+tD1GCLQXmWE1wgeaUdykpJAyzFtB01yFgOrlxTVTZy4mdS6TGyi/4eFjAPUA6 jcj0Kl4xX0ztEXz/Zp9kEx9o5Ru/UrFUpIK4SAUUuDQ4N67LTFK3yxEh2CUC7m0adOUP 1gHxwsKVH0SZc0+DuykAeVyYimoZernOJGtCCeVJMwa04DQNKjqOXzSPsHa3+ZWo/m7J 32PZ3YEHZk2aPfNUPO2HlQKzOW6WOXOHxbD92uWO/wIsmaN3zp+ihkGnJmmmROK6US44 v1ww== X-Gm-Message-State: APzg51AVVXvBSEVLZShBE/9uCj7dVtOpY3YtI6GIL3joAeQ8w5zYqi67 jUeNm2hr3OqbixXabduY2eaFZZKDvTDIGcptKfc= X-Received: by 2002:a37:4c0e:: with SMTP id z14-v6mr29191691qka.233.1536077120575; Tue, 04 Sep 2018 09:05:20 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20180827185507.17087-1-jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com> <20180827185507.17087-11-jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com> In-Reply-To: <20180827185507.17087-11-jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com> From: Andy Shevchenko Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2018 19:05:09 +0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v13 10/13] x86/sgx: Add sgx_einit() for initializing enclaves To: Jarkko Sakkinen Cc: "maintainer:X86 ARCHITECTURE (32-BIT AND 64-BIT)" , Platform Driver , Dave Hansen , sean.j.christopherson@intel.com, nhorman@redhat.com, npmccallum@redhat.com, linux-sgx@vger.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , "H. Peter Anvin" , suresh.b.siddha@intel.com, serge.ayoun@intel.com, Linux Kernel Mailing List Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Aug 27, 2018 at 9:58 PM Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > > From: Sean Christopherson > > Add a function to perform ENCLS(EINIT), which initializes an enclave, > which can be used by a driver for running enclaves and VMMs. > > Writing the LE hash MSRs is extraordinarily expensive, e.g. 3-4x slower > than normal MSRs, so we use a per-cpu cache to track the last known value > of the MSRs to avoid unnecessarily writing the MSRs with the current value. > > Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson > Co-developed-by: Jarkko Sakkinen > Signed-off-by: Jarkko Sakkinen > +int sgx_einit(struct sgx_sigstruct *sigstruct, struct sgx_einittoken *token, > + struct sgx_epc_page *secs_page, u64 lepubkeyhash[4]); This [4] doesn't make any sense in a C when used in function call parameter list. > +/* The cache for the last known values of IA32_SGXLEPUBKEYHASHx MSRs for each > + * CPU. The entries are initialized when they are first used by sgx_einit(). > + */ > +struct sgx_lepubkeyhash { > + u64 msrs[4]; 4 is MAGIC. > + u64 pm_cnt; > +}; > +int sgx_einit(struct sgx_sigstruct *sigstruct, struct sgx_einittoken *token, > + struct sgx_epc_page *secs_page, u64 lepubkeyhash[4]) Same two comments about [4]. > +{ > + cache = per_cpu(sgx_lepubkeyhash_cache, smp_processor_id()); > + if (!cache) { How often it's being expected to happen? > + cache = kzalloc(sizeof(struct sgx_lepubkeyhash), GFP_KERNEL); > + if (!cache) > + return -ENOMEM; > + } > + for (i = 0; i < 4; i++) { Same MAGIC? > + } > +} -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko