Received: by 2002:ac0:a5a6:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id m35-v6csp2823448imm; Tue, 4 Sep 2018 10:33:14 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ANB0VdYvclLfbYqHCIwyTwBy/jng4ZoEjRCvnm88Ccx7xBHVmtfElY2YyavlTpvI/yWuqgMXu1m8 X-Received: by 2002:a65:5307:: with SMTP id m7-v6mr8423765pgq.431.1536082394595; Tue, 04 Sep 2018 10:33:14 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1536082394; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=c+LmE2YqbxdgyHtW79yOQLig9yIheVfE5haJvAG+X7qofmJGeShk7F/W347fIEPG7U 5WLktyiyEC5ibHcXGHROx1orfNqvVGWZRz6fiEWvDMsfAlq81TgDuMTjxTXPcuSQuoMi KmzvN+lMU3FZEkwQtP5s7jtk4GFpwB7pUCoLKWnRodxlMBktafk0rPj61PPjzgOC76NE vXpx/usUILi9LKROZry9x9uwDMTRfl3v9snxBOyuPyspyfPL2TPmAIhRpCWGb92rtPVZ Y7ivze9dScZrleHatQpD0sA7yjpdP2/7YYqROLJQXoJmuK4loArSVWvOHbYuyroVyO8g K9LQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:mime-version:user-agent:references :message-id:in-reply-to:subject:cc:to:from:date :arc-authentication-results; bh=3eCFA2KvFUInruVb1Ih9PMdf6UD4+VexhfMg9vZR1Co=; b=r7UQK+92tXJTdUGd+AcqgrJJ6LphyXX6dJX/tYbEhem47P6b/et5v5U1Mk4/L61nbd hjcN6py8NGmXpIe5Bj7x3Dhrml0BZpGDzJPU+jGLhhvBMxFrqu09URoQfPEQaBXrPcAu 3Y96PGCl+t+j6YtPul8YDHUyHv4JFVwgtpCTBRYaWnEFea/Taa4l05REoIT231+H6hvG 7B0TUG6yYW46srHrBCxe6WCIxm+Lqx3VEhURjLwf/WVo9rue8Axv/4M375NjxXqlMu6s iUBUL2c648wNzdVNW6SOLmHfO7ZKCffhyyrL4YSQWM0rjMYOzGkYp8CVh3mG+NHrZPQ4 gfVA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id d34-v6si22732668pla.195.2018.09.04.10.32.58; Tue, 04 Sep 2018 10:33:14 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727879AbeIDV4x (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 4 Sep 2018 17:56:53 -0400 Received: from mx3-rdu2.redhat.com ([66.187.233.73]:52124 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726211AbeIDV4x (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Sep 2018 17:56:53 -0400 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx04.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.54.4]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 957F2401C96A; Tue, 4 Sep 2018 17:30:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from file01.intranet.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com (file01.intranet.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.5.7]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D031E202704B; Tue, 4 Sep 2018 17:30:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from file01.intranet.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by file01.intranet.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id w84HUi3U015746; Tue, 4 Sep 2018 13:30:44 -0400 Received: from localhost (mpatocka@localhost) by file01.intranet.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) with ESMTP id w84HUiYj015741; Tue, 4 Sep 2018 13:30:44 -0400 X-Authentication-Warning: file01.intranet.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com: mpatocka owned process doing -bs Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2018 13:30:44 -0400 (EDT) From: Mikulas Patocka X-X-Sender: mpatocka@file01.intranet.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com To: Michal Hocko cc: Mike Snitzer , jing xia , agk@redhat.com, dm-devel@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: dm bufio: Reduce dm_bufio_lock contention In-Reply-To: <20180904160732.GO14951@dhcp22.suse.cz> Message-ID: References: <1528790608-19557-1-git-send-email-jing.xia@unisoc.com> <20180612212007.GA22717@redhat.com> <20180614073153.GB9371@dhcp22.suse.cz> <20180904070824.GH14951@dhcp22.suse.cz> <20180904151844.GB10112@redhat.com> <20180904160732.GO14951@dhcp22.suse.cz> User-Agent: Alpine 2.02 (LRH 1266 2009-07-14) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.78 on 10.11.54.4 X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.11.55.5]); Tue, 04 Sep 2018 17:30:48 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: inspected by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.11.55.5]); Tue, 04 Sep 2018 17:30:48 +0000 (UTC) for IP:'10.11.54.4' DOMAIN:'int-mx04.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com' HELO:'smtp.corp.redhat.com' FROM:'mpatocka@redhat.com' RCPT:'' Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 4 Sep 2018, Michal Hocko wrote: > Regarding other other workloads. AFAIR the problem was due to the > wait_iff_congested in the direct reclaim. And I've been arguing that > special casing __GFP_NORETRY is not a propoer way to handle that case. > We have PF_LESS_THROTTLE to handle cases where the caller cannot be > really throttled because it is a part of the congestion control. I dunno > what happened in that regards since then though. > -- > Michal Hocko > SUSE Labs So, could you take this patch https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10505523/ and commit it to the kernel? You agreed with that patch, but you didn't commit it. Mikulas