Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 23 Mar 2001 11:18:59 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 23 Mar 2001 11:18:50 -0500 Received: from colin.muc.de ([193.149.48.1]:40466 "HELO colin.muc.de") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Fri, 23 Mar 2001 11:18:35 -0500 Message-ID: <20010323171716.28420@colin.muc.de> Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2001 17:17:16 +0100 From: Andi Kleen To: Jan Harkes Cc: Jeff Garzik , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org Subject: Re: Adding just a pinch of icache/dcache pressure... In-Reply-To: <20010323015358Z129164-406+3041@vger.kernel.org> <20010323122815.A6428@win.tue.nl> <3ABB6833.183E9188@mandrakesoft.com> <20010323111056.A9332@cs.cmu.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.88e In-Reply-To: <20010323111056.A9332@cs.cmu.edu>; from Jan Harkes on Fri, Mar 23, 2001 at 05:10:56PM +0100 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Mar 23, 2001 at 05:10:56PM +0100, Jan Harkes wrote: > btw. There definitely is a network receive buffer leak somewhere in > either the 3c905C path or higher up in the network layers (2.4.0 or > 2.4.1). The normal path does not leak anything. What do you mean with "normal path" ? And are you sure it was a leak? TCP can buffer quite a bit of skbs, but it should be bounded based on the number of sockets. -Andi - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/