Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Subject: Re: [Jfs-discussion] [PATCH v2 4/5] jfs: cache NULL when both
 default_acl and acl are NULL
To:     cgxu519 <cgxu519@gmx.com>
Cc:     jfs-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
References: <20180831143352.22970-1-cgxu519@gmx.com>
 <20180831143352.22970-4-cgxu519@gmx.com>
 <0e37733e-9acd-cf82-62f7-420f0fa864eb@oracle.com>
 <c231d198-7a4e-63a0-0a7d-9211ab0abfe9@gmx.com>
From:   Dave Kleikamp <dave.kleikamp@oracle.com>
Openpgp: preference=signencrypt
Message-ID: <582c17b3-5d52-24c0-8d95-af3d62071738@oracle.com>
Date:   Wed, 5 Sep 2018 07:28:34 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/60.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <c231d198-7a4e-63a0-0a7d-9211ab0abfe9@gmx.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On 9/5/18 1:13 AM, cgxu519 wrote:
> 
> On 09/04/2018 04:34 AM, Dave Kleikamp wrote:
>> Are you pushing these as a series, or would you like this patch pushed
>> through the jfs tree?
> I'd hope maintainers pick individual patch to their tree.

I'll take care of this one.

Thanks,
Shaggy

> 
> Thanks,
> Chengguang
> 
>>
>> On 8/31/18 9:33 AM, Chengguang Xu wrote:
>>> default_acl and acl of newly created inode will be initiated
>>> as ACL_NOT_CACHED in vfs function inode_init_always() and later
>>> will be updated by calling xxx_init_acl() in specific filesystems.
>>> Howerver, when default_acl and acl are NULL then they keep the value
>>> of ACL_NOT_CACHED, this patch tries to cache NULL for acl/default_acl
>>> in this case.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Chengguang Xu <cgxu519@gmx.com>
>> Acked-by: Dave Kleikamp <dave.kleikamp@oracle.com>
>>