Received: by 2002:ac0:a5a6:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id m35-v6csp4081502imm; Wed, 5 Sep 2018 10:22:09 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ANB0VdYu4W5vKBbtyVY2cwZdR3ZY9oDEwb8EDzM9MdWTcQC3dtL2QyXmP5nNxRSRA9Asoh9MbIGL X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:6684:: with SMTP id e4-v6mr36326637plk.50.1536168129792; Wed, 05 Sep 2018 10:22:09 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1536168129; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=z34P5llNI8fvDIV74U7bnOecrtX3+u6o+oPZyFC4RDGJshnZyH2gYpPXwbFazt+y2h Sdk50D9ourkIl9MiLzmN0gRxK5v3F5BDb/V/mjZNeNAWcUUa3+mBdm9qPZnK+h0r9RUI q2BivlxGyY9mKPkZVyWxQwzqp9XOkFdTmN7tSOz4PPzLfb+x6cTnm4BgIWF+s3w3W14B kVQrD3iNFKEQ17fbjZBGAwcKkPdCWR2FQOU0ajRSp+n4bp6kIsVJI7GomSGcuDHPEUbM kQd5I30svnUyF5CLjhjIxBkgqVi76lX+XSrMoiVxnuvK620jjIPJOdrRMcMYX1khPipV no0g== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:message-id:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-disposition:mime-version:references:subject:cc:to:from:date; bh=/IrwVfAvlsgixSvtzaKTwUVrjROvH/JFBh5hS9mb74g=; b=IxJgc3hmKaeTecPSJb9Fpc6eD5kLcAcVUcONmk28mrJztFKjMbwceoXzsG1OInpTEv quzFoOGwZ5VYENr1frbktGS+6iFyvXT28bV0n9JXqPqnfZNtfMLOTBGx4uBABQ8zXqxa 8EwI6DvodpUZjhYSgYf2biGOzDaFPpGj5wki5CqjpnbnL6O7iBpMDsMQJJcuuHR9Mjfz IU/TydopqPhupJ82rLA/vvG6usCZgEm866NXyBPYscTAGJ0Oesk3wxcfRnLhKSmfYSwN WPw1qFEed8XN9p+PTFsFhNsQQgSQk5g9EIBMYinHoiEQrGh1vhaOPNf8H4Lwabvsp9Jq d/wg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ibm.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id y7-v6si2300966pgp.551.2018.09.05.10.21.54; Wed, 05 Sep 2018 10:22:09 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ibm.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727660AbeIEVvj (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 5 Sep 2018 17:51:39 -0400 Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.156.1]:50814 "EHLO mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726046AbeIEVvh (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 Sep 2018 17:51:37 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098409.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.22/8.16.0.22) with SMTP id w85HJ9Ua132333 for ; Wed, 5 Sep 2018 13:20:30 -0400 Received: from e06smtp07.uk.ibm.com (e06smtp07.uk.ibm.com [195.75.94.103]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2majgjtnfj-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Wed, 05 Sep 2018 13:20:29 -0400 Received: from localhost by e06smtp07.uk.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Wed, 5 Sep 2018 18:20:27 +0100 Received: from b06cxnps4074.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (9.149.109.196) by e06smtp07.uk.ibm.com (192.168.101.137) with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted; (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256/256) Wed, 5 Sep 2018 18:20:22 +0100 Received: from d06av25.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av25.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.105.61]) by b06cxnps4074.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id w85HKLNp28311556 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Wed, 5 Sep 2018 17:20:21 GMT Received: from d06av25.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C07711C052; Wed, 5 Sep 2018 20:20:14 +0100 (BST) Received: from d06av25.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76FD911C04C; Wed, 5 Sep 2018 20:20:12 +0100 (BST) Received: from rapoport-lnx (unknown [9.148.206.219]) by d06av25.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS; Wed, 5 Sep 2018 20:20:12 +0100 (BST) Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2018 20:20:18 +0300 From: Mike Rapoport To: Rob Herring Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, Andrew Morton , davem@davemloft.net, Greg Kroah-Hartman , mingo@redhat.com, Michael Ellerman , mhocko@suse.com, paul.burton@mips.com, Thomas Gleixner , tony.luck@intel.com, linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, linux-mips@linux-mips.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 07/29] memblock: remove _virt from APIs returning virtual address References: <1536163184-26356-1-git-send-email-rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <1536163184-26356-8-git-send-email-rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 x-cbid: 18090517-0028-0000-0000-000002F4C67A X-IBM-AV-DETECTION: SAVI=unused REMOTE=unused XFE=unused x-cbparentid: 18090517-0029-0000-0000-000023AE4781 Message-Id: <20180905172017.GA2203@rapoport-lnx> X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:,, definitions=2018-09-05_10:,, signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1015 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1807170000 definitions=main-1809050174 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Sep 05, 2018 at 12:04:36PM -0500, Rob Herring wrote: > On Wed, Sep 5, 2018 at 11:00 AM Mike Rapoport wrote: > > > > The conversion is done using > > > > sed -i 's@memblock_virt_alloc@memblock_alloc@g' \ > > $(git grep -l memblock_virt_alloc) > > What's the reason to do this? It seems like a lot of churn even if a > mechanical change. I felt that memblock_virt_alloc_ is too long for a prefix, e.g: memblock_virt_alloc_node_nopanic, memblock_virt_alloc_low_nopanic. And for consistency I've changed the memblock_virt_alloc as well. > Rob > -- Sincerely yours, Mike.