Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <2192189d-b8bb-3233-c9f3-14cbeeddaf34@gmail.com>
References: <20180905203443.32289-1-igor.stoppa@huawei.com>
 <CAGXu5j+e2n6pUW+40ZNm5qifd8dVEEryN-Qfqe7ok-KZHP1Hyw@mail.gmail.com> <2192189d-b8bb-3233-c9f3-14cbeeddaf34@gmail.com>
From:   Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Date:   Wed, 5 Sep 2018 16:31:18 -0700
Message-ID: <CAGXu5jKoKsj=qbKrcYGiQWJnSrLwfoBHL40RK37qZyLgXWk=DQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] seccomp: remove unnecessary unlikely()
To:     Igor Stoppa <igor.stoppa@gmail.com>
Cc:     Igor Stoppa <igor.stoppa@huawei.com>,
        linux-security-module <linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, Sep 5, 2018 at 3:49 PM, Igor Stoppa <igor.stoppa@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> On 06/09/18 01:23, Kees Cook wrote:
>
>> Should I take this, or is it part of your series going somewhere else?
>
>
> It turned out it doesn't really work to have a generic series against 20
> trees :-/

I know that pain very well!

> I'm submitting them individually to each subsystem.
> So this one is just for security.

Sounds good.

James, can you take this directly, or would you prefer a pull request from me?

-Kees

-- 
Kees Cook
Pixel Security