Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Thu, 6 Sep 2018 10:31:49 +0200
From:   Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
To:     Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc:     linux-mm@kvack.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
        Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
        Paul Burton <paul.burton@mips.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>, linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-mips@linux-mips.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
        sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 04/29] mm: remove bootmem allocator implementation.
Message-ID: <20180906083149.GZ14951@dhcp22.suse.cz>
References: <1536163184-26356-1-git-send-email-rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
 <1536163184-26356-5-git-send-email-rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
 <20180906073023.GO14951@dhcp22.suse.cz>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20180906073023.GO14951@dhcp22.suse.cz>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Thu 06-09-18 09:30:23, Michal Hocko wrote:
> Is there any reason to keep
> 
> ifdef CONFIG_NO_BOOTMEM
> 	obj-y		+= nobootmem.o
> else
> 	obj-y		+= bootmem.o
> endif
> 
> behind?

I can see you have done so in an earlier patch. I have missed that.
-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs