Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261656AbTKHJ5k (ORCPT ); Sat, 8 Nov 2003 04:57:40 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261683AbTKHJ5k (ORCPT ); Sat, 8 Nov 2003 04:57:40 -0500 Received: from mail0.epfl.ch ([128.178.50.57]:4615 "HELO mail0.epfl.ch") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S261656AbTKHJ5j (ORCPT ); Sat, 8 Nov 2003 04:57:39 -0500 Date: Sat, 8 Nov 2003 10:57:37 +0100 From: Gregoire Favre To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Why are 2.6.0-test9-bk so slow for my mouse? (and otherthings) Message-ID: <20031108095737.GA8764@magma.epfl.ch> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 803 Lines: 22 Hello, 2.6.0-test9 is just tremendous ;-) I have also tried 2.6.0-test9-bk5 and 2.6.0-test9-bk12 and the system seems much slower than under 2.4 :-( Also when I change for a screen to the other (I use fvwm2). I have a P4@2200 with 1Gb DDR, MSI Max2-BLR motherboard, two DVB-s cards, one SB live, one Adaptec AIC-7892A U160/m, one Adaptec AHA-2940U/UW/D / AIC-7881U and a Matrox G550. Any idea why? Gr?goire ________________________________________________________________________ http://magma.epfl.ch/greg ICQ:16624071 mailto:Gregoire.Favre@freesurf.ch - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/