Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20180817070105.1725-1-simon.k.r.goldschmidt@gmail.com>
 <20180904194944.19721-1-simon.k.r.goldschmidt@gmail.com> <20180906110926.GF5360@sirena.org.uk>
In-Reply-To: <20180906110926.GF5360@sirena.org.uk>
From:   Simon Goldschmidt <simon.k.r.goldschmidt@gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 6 Sep 2018 13:23:34 +0200
Message-ID: <CAAh8qsyMcL-acBf4nXq2RSE=Y43FMG8v+TuyvvmgGtkjHchAyQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] spi: dw: support 4-16 bits per word
To:     Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc:     linux-spi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>,
        Trent Piepho <tpiepho@impinj.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Thu, Sep 6, 2018 at 1:09 PM Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Sep 04, 2018 at 09:49:44PM +0200, Simon Goldschmidt wrote:
> > The spi-dw driver currently only supports 8 or 16 bits per word.
> >
> > Since the hardware supports 4-16 bits per word, adapt the driver
> > to also support this.
>
> Please don't send new patches in reply to old patch serieses, it makes
> it harder to follow what the current version of things is and makes it
> much easier for the patches to get lost in the old threads.

Ok, no problem and thanks for the hint! Where does this requirement
come from? Patchwork or mail sorting habits?

Anyway, how does this continue, will you pick the patch or do I need
to somehow collect yet more reviews?

Regards,
Simon