Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20180817070105.1725-1-simon.k.r.goldschmidt@gmail.com>
 <20180904194944.19721-1-simon.k.r.goldschmidt@gmail.com> <20180906110926.GF5360@sirena.org.uk>
 <CAAh8qsyMcL-acBf4nXq2RSE=Y43FMG8v+TuyvvmgGtkjHchAyQ@mail.gmail.com> <20180906132333.GG5360@sirena.org.uk>
In-Reply-To: <20180906132333.GG5360@sirena.org.uk>
From:   Simon Goldschmidt <simon.k.r.goldschmidt@gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 6 Sep 2018 15:37:30 +0200
Message-ID: <CAAh8qsxKQF4ZPJACYy03z9LQzU0tBB9wv9ztZ3AC4kE_OHGH4g@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] spi: dw: support 4-16 bits per word
To:     Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc:     linux-spi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>,
        Trent Piepho <tpiepho@impinj.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Thu, Sep 6, 2018 at 3:23 PM Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Sep 06, 2018 at 01:23:34PM +0200, Simon Goldschmidt wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 6, 2018 at 1:09 PM Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> > > Please don't send new patches in reply to old patch serieses, it makes
> > > it harder to follow what the current version of things is and makes it
> > > much easier for the patches to get lost in the old threads.
>
> > Ok, no problem and thanks for the hint! Where does this requirement
> > come from? Patchwork or mail sorting habits?
>
> Mail sorting.  It can mean that you get things like someone deleting a
> thread and the new patch getting caught up in a thread delete command
> and hence missed.
>
> > Anyway, how does this continue, will you pick the patch or do I need
> > to somehow collect yet more reviews?
>
> You should've got a mail at about the same time saying it's been
> applied.

Right, got it. Thanks again.